A SCARS Institute Special Report: The Many Types of Trauma

Psychological Trauma Does Not Have One Universally Accepted Master List

Principal Category: Psychology / Recoverology™

Author:
•  Tim McGuinness, Ph.D. – Anthropologist, Scientist, Polymath, Director of the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc.

Abstract

Psychological trauma takes different forms according to its duration, developmental timing, relational source, triggering event, method of exposure, and social transmission. Relationship scams frequently create overlapping injuries involving acute shock, chronic manipulation, attachment disruption, betrayal, financial loss, moral conflict, traumatic grief, and digital exposure. Earlier childhood adversity, relationship trauma, cultural experience, and previous victimization influence how a victim understands and responds to the crime. Recovery also faces continuing pressures from offender contact, debt, identity misuse, family conflict, institutional failures, and retraumatizing reminders. Effective support identifies the specific injuries involved and matches them with appropriate safety measures, education, counseling, grief processing, financial reconstruction, advocacy, social reconnection, and trauma-focused care. Traumatological Anthropology places these experiences within their complete relational, cultural, historical, institutional, and human context.

Keywords

Traumatological Anthropology, Psychological Trauma, Scam Victimization, Betrayal Trauma, Attachment Trauma, Financial Trauma, Moral Injury, Traumatic Grief, Retraumatization, Recovery Practices

Psychological Trauma Does Not Have One Universally Accepted Master List

The following is not an exhaustive catalog of all known traumas, but is a listing that will help professionals, advocates, victims/survivors, and their families to recognize both the expanse of trauma and how each must be recognized to facilitate healing.

You cannot heal a thing unless you know it exists.

Author’s Note

Trauma reaches far beyond a single event or diagnosis. Scam victimization demonstrates how psychological injury develops through the interaction of criminal manipulation, human attachment, personal history, financial consequences, social responses, and institutional behavior. Traumatological Anthropology provides a way to examine these forces together while preserving the individuality of each victim’s experience. Recognizing the different injuries involved creates a clearer path toward stabilization, informed support, personal agency, and lasting recovery.

A Work of Traumatological Anthropology

This document represents a work of Traumatological Anthropology, an interdisciplinary approach to understanding psychological trauma as a complete human experience. Traumatological Anthropology examines how people experience, interpret, express, transmit, and recover from trauma within their relational, cultural, social, developmental, institutional, and historical environments. It looks beyond symptoms and diagnostic categories to study the human systems that give trauma its meaning and shape its consequences.

Trauma never occurs entirely outside the person’s life history. Earlier attachment experiences, family relationships, cultural beliefs, moral values, social expectations, community identities, and previous losses influence how a threatening or destabilizing event is understood. The same event produces different reactions because every person encounters it through a distinct combination of memory, identity, experience, belief, and social context. Traumatological Anthropology studies these differences without reducing trauma to either biology or culture alone.

Within scam victimization, this approach examines how offenders exploit universal human needs for attachment, trust, safety, belonging, purpose, recognition, and hope. It also examines how manipulation interacts with childhood experiences, relationship histories, financial circumstances, moral beliefs, cultural expectations, institutional systems, and community responses. The crime does not end when the offender disappears. Family reactions, financial consequences, law-enforcement encounters, platform failures, public attitudes, and recovery experiences continue shaping the injury.

Traumatological Anthropology also recognizes that trauma moves through relationships and social systems. It affects families, support communities, advocates, professionals, institutions, and future generations. Some trauma arises through direct exposure, while other distress develops through witnessed events, repeated contact with suffering, inherited family patterns, cultural memory, or belief systems adopted by the individual. These sources require careful distinction because they do not produce identical injuries or demand identical recovery responses.

By organizing trauma according to duration, developmental timing, human relationships, triggering events, methods of exposure, and group transmission, Traumatological Anthropology provides a wider framework for understanding what happened to a victim and what recovery requires. It connects psychological injury with the social and cultural world in which that injury occurred. It treats a traumatized person not as a collection of symptoms, but as a complete human being whose identity, relationships, values, environment, and history all participate in both trauma and recovery.

PART ONE: TYPES OF TRAUMA

Overview

Professionals classify trauma by duration, developmental timing, source, relationship, and method of exposure. Several types overlap because one experience can produce multiple forms of trauma. Trauma describes the psychological injury or experience, while PTSD, complex PTSD, acute stress disorder, and prolonged grief disorder describe possible clinical outcomes.

Trauma Classified by Duration and Pattern

Psychological trauma is shaped not only by what happened, but also by how long the experience continued, how frequently it occurred, and whether the danger truly ended. A single overwhelming discovery creates a different pattern of injury from months or years of manipulation, coercion, manufactured emergencies, and financial exploitation. Some victims endure several connected traumatic events before they have time to process the first, while others appear stable until a later stressor releases reactions that were previously suppressed. Classifying trauma by duration and pattern helps explain why scam victims experience different symptoms, recovery timelines, and support needs even when they encountered similar crimes. These categories frequently overlap, and one victim can experience several patterns at the same time.

• Acute Trauma: Trauma produced by a single overwhelming event, such as an assault, accident, disaster, sudden betrayal, or discovery of a major fraud.
• Chronic Trauma: Trauma produced by repeated or prolonged exposure to harmful, threatening, coercive, or destabilizing conditions.
• Complex Trauma: Trauma associated with multiple, repeated, or prolonged experiences, especially interpersonal harm involving control, dependency, entrapment, or betrayal. Complex trauma frequently begins during childhood, although adults also experience it.
• Cumulative Trauma: Trauma resulting from the combined psychological burden of numerous stressful or traumatic experiences over time.
• Sequential Trauma: Trauma created by a continuing series of connected events, with each new event adding injury before earlier experiences have been processed.
• Recurrent Trauma: Trauma involving the repetition of similar traumatic experiences at different times.
• Continuous Traumatic Stress: Trauma associated with an ongoing threat that has not ended, leaving the person exposed to continuing danger or uncertainty.
• Delayed Trauma: Trauma whose psychological effects become evident long after the original experience, often following a later stressor or reminder.

Trauma Classified by Developmental Timing

The timing of trauma influences how deeply it affects emotional regulation, attachment, identity, judgment, and the ability to recognize safety. Trauma experienced during childhood occurs while the brain and personality are still developing, which means the child adapts to danger without having adult knowledge, independence, or protective resources. Those adaptations can continue into adulthood as automatic beliefs and behaviors concerning trust, love, responsibility, abandonment, conflict, and personal worth. Scammers do not need to know the victim’s complete childhood history to exploit these patterns. They identify unmet needs, emotional sensitivities, and familiar relationship responses through conversation and observation. Understanding developmental timing helps a victim separate childhood survival strategies from present-day choices and develop the adult skills, boundaries, and sense of safety that earlier circumstances prevented from forming securely.

• Childhood Trauma: Trauma experienced during childhood, including abuse, neglect, violence, exploitation, abandonment, and major disruptions in safety.
• Developmental Trauma: Trauma that occurs during important stages of neurological, emotional, social, or identity development.
• Early Attachment Trauma: Trauma arising when a child’s primary source of protection, security, or emotional regulation also becomes a source of fear, neglect, inconsistency, or harm.
• Adverse Childhood Experiences Trauma: The cumulative effects associated with childhood abuse, neglect, household instability, violence, incarceration, substance misuse, or other serious adversity.

Trauma Classified by Human Relationships

Trauma caused through human relationships carries a distinctive injury because the source of harm is another person or trusted institution rather than an impersonal event. Relationship scammers deliberately create intimacy, dependence, loyalty, and emotional safety before using those bonds to manipulate and exploit the victim. The resulting trauma damages more than trust in the offender. It disrupts the victim’s confidence in personal judgment, attachment, family relationships, social connection, and the reliability of institutions expected to provide protection. Earlier experiences of abandonment, abuse, betrayal, or unstable attachment also become active again when the crime repeats familiar emotional conditions. Classifying trauma through relationships helps identify who caused the harm, which bonds were damaged, how trust was weaponized, and what forms of safety, accountability, and healthy connection must be rebuilt during recovery.

• Interpersonal Trauma: Trauma caused by another person through abuse, violence, coercion, exploitation, deception, stalking, or deliberate betrayal.
• Betrayal Trauma: Trauma created when a trusted person or institution violates the person’s dependence, loyalty, intimacy, safety, or confidence.
• Attachment Trauma: Trauma that damages the person’s sense of emotional security, connection, trust, and safety within close relationships.
• Relationship Trauma: Trauma arising from harmful relationship experiences, including coercive control, emotional abuse, manipulation, abandonment, deception, and exploitation.
• Intimate Partner Trauma: Trauma caused within a romantic or intimate relationship through violence, coercion, control, exploitation, or sustained psychological abuse.
• Sexual Trauma: Trauma resulting from sexual assault, coercion, exploitation, harassment, or unwanted sexual exposure.
• Family Trauma: Trauma affecting individuals or an entire family through violence, abuse, loss, displacement, addiction, conflict, or severe instability.
• Institutional Betrayal Trauma: Trauma intensified when an institution fails to prevent harm, dismisses a victim, conceals misconduct, retaliates, or refuses meaningful assistance.
• Abandonment Trauma: Trauma associated with actual or perceived desertion, rejection, emotional withdrawal, or the sudden loss of an essential relationship.

Trauma Classified by Event or Environment

The event or environment surrounding trauma shapes the victim’s perception of danger, loss, responsibility, and control. Crime, financial exploitation, illness, accidents, disasters, violence, captivity, and displacement each create different psychological demands and practical consequences. Scam victims frequently experience several of these conditions together. A relationship scam represents deliberate crime, financial destruction, interpersonal betrayal, identity abuse, and the loss of a relationship and future the victim believed were real. Earlier experiences involving medical emergencies, combat, disasters, violence, displacement, or traumatic loss also influence how the victim responds when scammers manufacture danger, illness, kidnapping, arrest, or other crises. Classifying trauma by event or environment helps identify the specific source of injury, distinguish actual danger from criminal fabrication, and determine which forms of safety, financial repair, grief work, advocacy, and psychological support recovery requires.

• Crime Victimization Trauma: Trauma caused by experiencing crime, including fraud, robbery, assault, stalking, trafficking, identity theft, and financial exploitation.
• Financial Trauma: Trauma associated with severe financial loss, exploitation, debt, insecurity, deprivation, or the destruction of financial stability.
• Scam and Fraud Trauma: Trauma produced by calculated deception, relationship manipulation, financial exploitation, identity abuse, betrayal, and the collapse of an intentionally manufactured reality.
• Medical Trauma: Trauma associated with serious illness, painful procedures, medical emergencies, frightening diagnoses, intensive care, disability, or harmful healthcare experiences.
• Accident Trauma: Trauma resulting from vehicle collisions, workplace accidents, falls, fires, explosions, or other sudden injuries.
• Disaster Trauma: Trauma caused by natural or human-made disasters, including hurricanes, floods, earthquakes, wildfires, industrial accidents, and infrastructure failures.
• Combat Trauma: Trauma arising from warfare, combat exposure, killing, injury, captivity, loss, and persistent threats to life.
• Terrorism Trauma: Trauma resulting from terrorist violence, hostage situations, mass casualty events, or continuing fear of politically motivated attacks.
• Torture Trauma: Trauma caused by the deliberate infliction of physical or psychological suffering for punishment, intimidation, control, or information.
• Captivity Trauma: Trauma arising from confinement, hostage-taking, imprisonment, trafficking, coercive control, or conditions that prevent escape.
• Displacement Trauma: Trauma associated with forced migration, war, persecution, eviction, exile, refugee experiences, or the loss of home and community.
• Traumatic Loss: Trauma connected with a sudden, violent, preventable, ambiguous, or deeply destabilizing death or separation.

Trauma Classified by Method of Exposure

The way a person encounters trauma influences how the experience is understood, remembered, and carried forward. Some victims experience harm directly, while others witness suffering, absorb the traumatic accounts of people they support, or inherit unresolved fear and survival patterns through family relationships. Digital environments create another pathway by delivering threats, manipulation, exploitation, disturbing material, and repeated reminders through devices that remain present in everyday life. Scam victims frequently move between several exposure methods. They experience the crime directly, witness the distress it causes their families, hear similar accounts from other survivors, and repeatedly encounter reminders through messages, photographs, platforms, and security alerts. Classifying trauma by method of exposure helps identify how the injury entered the person’s life, what continues to reactivate it, and which boundaries, protections, support structures, and recovery practices are needed.

• Direct Trauma: Trauma experienced personally through direct exposure to danger, violence, injury, exploitation, or loss.
• Witnessed Trauma: Trauma resulting from seeing another person harmed, threatened, injured, or killed.
• Secondary Traumatic Stress: Trauma symptoms that develop through close exposure to another person’s traumatic experiences, especially among caregivers, advocates, emergency personnel, and family members.
• Vicarious Trauma: Lasting changes in beliefs, emotional functioning, identity, and worldview caused by repeated engagement with other people’s trauma. SAMHSA provides specialized resources for victim-service and emergency-response organizations addressing this exposure.
• Transmitted Trauma: Trauma communicated through family relationships, behavior, silence, fear, beliefs, or unresolved responses across generations.
• Digital Trauma: Trauma produced or intensified through online abuse, exploitation, harassment, intimate-image abuse, impersonation, fraud, or repeated digital exposure to disturbing material.

Trauma Affecting Groups and Generations

Trauma does not remain confined to one person or one moment in time. Shared violence, exploitation, oppression, displacement, discrimination, and institutional failure reshape families, communities, cultures, and future generations. These experiences influence collective beliefs about safety, authority, trust, money, outsiders, and the consequences of seeking help. Scammers exploit these inherited and shared patterns by targeting cultural values, family obligations, religious beliefs, migration experiences, racial identities, and established distrust of institutions. A victim’s response to a scam reflects both personal injury and the larger social history through which the crime is understood. Classifying trauma at the group and generational level helps explain why victimization affects families and communities differently, why some victims resist formal assistance, and why recovery must respect cultural identity, historical experience, community relationships, and legitimate reasons for mistrust.

• Collective Trauma: Psychological injury experienced across a community or population following a shared catastrophe, attack, oppression, or disruption.
• Community Trauma: Trauma affecting a geographically or socially connected community through violence, deprivation, disaster, systemic instability, or repeated losses.
• Historical Trauma: Cumulative trauma experienced by a group across generations because of colonization, slavery, genocide, forced displacement, cultural destruction, or sustained oppression.
• Intergenerational Trauma: Trauma effects passed from one generation to another through family behavior, attachment patterns, social conditions, cultural memory, and biological stress processes.
• Racial Trauma: Trauma associated with racism, racial violence, discrimination, humiliation, threat, and repeated exposure to race-based hostility.
• Cultural Trauma: Trauma affecting a group’s shared identity, traditions, meaning, security, or continuity following persecution, forced assimilation, displacement, or cultural destruction.

Not all group-based or generational trauma results from a personally experienced external event, action, or process. Some individuals assume a traumatic identity through beliefs, narratives, interpretations, and group meanings they have adopted over time. They experience themselves as injured, endangered, or burdened by events they did not personally encounter because those events have become integrated into their identity and worldview. This does not make the resulting distress imaginary, but it distinguishes personally experienced trauma from inherited, learned, interpreted, or self-assumed trauma. Accurate recovery work must identify whether distress arises from direct exposure, family transmission, current discrimination, community experience, cultural memory, adopted beliefs, or a combination of these sources.

Related Concepts That Are Not Separate Trauma Types

Several important psychological injuries, reactions, and processes remain closely connected with trauma without describing the original form of traumatic exposure. Moral injury concerns violations of deeply held values. Traumatic grief describes bereavement complicated by traumatic circumstances. Compassion fatigue develops through sustained exposure to suffering, while retraumatization describes the reactivation or deepening of an existing injury. Trauma-related mental health conditions also describe patterns of symptoms and impairment rather than categories of traumatic events. Distinguishing the original trauma from its psychological consequences helps victims, advocates, and professionals identify what happened, how the person responded, what continues to reinforce the distress, and which forms of support or treatment address the resulting condition.

• Moral Injury: Psychological, spiritual, or ethical injury caused by perpetrating, witnessing, failing to prevent, or being betrayed through actions that violate deeply held moral beliefs.
• Traumatic Grief: Grief complicated by the traumatic circumstances surrounding a death or loss.
• Compassion Fatigue: Emotional and physical depletion associated with sustained caregiving and repeated exposure to suffering.
• Retraumatization: The reactivation or reinforcement of traumatic distress through new experiences that resemble, repeat, or reproduce elements of an earlier trauma.

PTSD, complex PTSD, acute stress disorder, adjustment disorder, dissociative disorders, depression, anxiety disorders, and prolonged grief disorder belong on a list of possible trauma-related conditions, not a list of trauma types. Acute stress disorder occurs during the first month following trauma, while PTSD involves a defined pattern of symptoms that continues beyond that period.

PART TWO: EFFECTS ON SCAM VICTIMS

How Different Forms of Trauma Affect Scam Victims and Their Recovery

Relationship scams rarely produce one isolated psychological injury. The crime combines deception, attachment, manipulation, financial exploitation, coercion, identity disruption, and betrayal. Discovery ends the manufactured relationship, but it also begins a second period of exposure involving financial consequences, disbelief, family conflict, institutional responses, offender recontact, public humiliation, and repeated reminders.

Research describes romance scams as producing a double trauma involving both financial loss and the loss of a relationship the victim experienced as real. Fraud victimization is also associated with shame, anxiety, depression, isolation, self-blame, damaged relationships, and reduced trust.

The following sections explain how each recognized trauma category relates to scam victimization. Some forms arise directly from the crime. Others existed before the crime and influenced the victim’s vulnerability or recovery. Several apply only when additional circumstances occurred.

General Forms of Trauma

Acute Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: Acute trauma usually begins at discovery. The victim learns in a single moment that the relationship, identity, emergency, investment, or promised future was fabricated. A threatening call, sudden financial loss, account seizure, arrest warning, sextortion demand, or confrontation with undeniable evidence also produces an acute traumatic event.

After the crime and retraumatization: Bank notices, new discoveries, offender threats, family confrontations, or learning that photographs and intimate information were stolen recreate the shock.

Effect on recovery: Acute trauma disrupts sleep, concentration, appetite, judgment, emotional regulation, and short-term memory.

What needs to be done: Recovery begins with physical safety, financial containment, nervous-system stabilization, reliable information, supportive contact, and a simple daily structure.

Chronic Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: Chronic trauma develops when manipulation, manufactured emergencies, financial demands, emotional coercion, threats, and uncertainty continue for months or years. The victim repeatedly moves between hope, fear, relief, and crisis.

After the crime and retraumatization: Debt, continuing contact, identity misuse, recovery scams, litigation, family conflict, and repeated financial emergencies extend the exposure.

Effect on recovery: The victim remains hyperalert and expects another crisis. Calm feels unfamiliar, and ordinary problems trigger disproportionate fear.

What needs to be done: Recovery requires sustained structure, predictable support, firm separation from offenders, financial rehabilitation, trauma-informed counseling, and repeated practice regulating emotional activation.

Complex Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: Complex trauma arises from prolonged interpersonal manipulation involving attachment, dependency, betrayal, coercion, and restricted psychological escape. Childhood abuse, earlier relationship trauma, or previous victimization deepens the injury.

After the crime and retraumatization: Blame, disbelief, institutional dismissal, repeated exploitation, isolation, and continuing financial danger reinforce helplessness and damaged trust.

Effect on recovery: Complex trauma affects emotional regulation, identity, relationships, self-worth, decision-making, and the ability to trust personal perceptions.

What needs to be done: Recovery requires staged work involving safety, stabilization, education, emotional regulation, identity reconstruction, relationship repair, and careful trauma processing. Complex trauma is strongly associated with chronic, repeated interpersonal harm.

Cumulative Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: Cumulative trauma forms when the scam joins earlier losses, abuse, bereavement, illness, divorce, financial hardship, discrimination, or previous fraud.

After the crime and retraumatization: Debt, family rejection, further scams, employment problems, health decline, and disappointing institutional responses add new injuries.

Effect on recovery: The victim reacts to the combined burden rather than the scam alone. Energy, attention, confidence, and coping capacity become depleted.

What needs to be done: Recovery must identify the complete burden, establish priorities, separate current problems from earlier wounds, and address one manageable area at a time.

Sequential Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: Sequential trauma develops through a chain of connected injuries. The victim experiences courtship, manipulation, financial extraction, discovery, confrontation, threats, and abandonment as successive events.

After the crime and retraumatization: Banking problems, reporting interviews, creditor demands, family disputes, publicity, and recovery scammers continue the sequence.

Effect on recovery: The victim never experiences a clear endpoint. Each new consequence confirms the expectation that another disaster will follow.

What needs to be done: The sequence must be documented, divided into separate events, and addressed through an organized recovery plan that creates visible endpoints and completed tasks.

Recurrent Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: Recurrent trauma occurs when a victim experiences repeated scams, repeated offender returns, or multiple cycles of separation and renewed manipulation.

After the crime and retraumatization: Impersonators, recovery scammers, cloned profiles, and renewed contact reproduce the original emotional pattern.

Effect on recovery: Repetition strengthens hopelessness, self-blame, distrust, and the belief that victimization will continue indefinitely.

What needs to be done: The victim needs complete offender separation, strengthened contact boundaries, scam-pattern education, improved verification habits, and a review of the emotional conditions that allowed each reentry.

Continuous Traumatic Stress

Cause before or during the crime: This pattern applies when danger remains active. Examples include sextortion, stalking, continuing identity theft, threats against relatives, intimate-image abuse, immigration coercion, or persistent financial access.

After the crime and retraumatization: New messages, unauthorized transactions, online impersonations, or threats confirm that the danger has not ended.

Effect on recovery: The nervous system remains mobilized because the threat remains real. Conventional reassurance fails when actual exposure continues.

What needs to be done: Safety planning, evidence preservation, account protection, legal assistance, law-enforcement engagement, and controlled communication take priority before deeper trauma processing.

Delayed Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: Some victims remain functional during the crime because immediate demands require action. Emotional numbing, denial, dissociation, and crisis-driven focus postpone the full reaction.

After the crime and retraumatization: Symptoms emerge after financial stabilization, offender separation, retirement, a legal decision, an anniversary, or another loss.

Effect on recovery: The victim interprets delayed distress as regression even though the mind has finally begun processing what happened.

What needs to be done: The delayed reaction must be normalized, assessed, and incorporated into recovery rather than treated as proof that previous progress failed.

Developmental Traumas

Childhood Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: Childhood trauma predates the scam. Abuse, neglect, abandonment, instability, bullying, or household violence shapes later expectations about love, safety, responsibility, and belonging. The offender discovers and exploits these needs.

After the crime and retraumatization: Abandonment, criticism, silence, coercion, and betrayal reproduce childhood emotional conditions.

Effect on recovery: The victim responds to both the present crime and earlier unresolved injuries. Shame and helplessness feel older and larger than the scam.

What needs to be done: Recovery must distinguish childhood beliefs from current facts and address the earlier trauma through qualified trauma-informed care.

Developmental Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: Developmental trauma begins when prolonged adversity disrupts emotional, social, cognitive, or identity development. It does not originate with an adult scam, but it influences how a victim understands attachment, boundaries, danger, and self-worth.

After the crime and retraumatization: The crime confirms long-standing beliefs such as being unlovable, powerless, defective, or responsible for other people’s behavior.

Effect on recovery: The victim struggles with emotional regulation, self-definition, trust, and independent decision-making.

What needs to be done: Recovery requires skills that were never securely established, including boundary setting, emotional identification, reality testing, self-protection, and safe relational engagement.

Early Attachment Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: Early attachment trauma develops when caregivers provide inconsistent, frightening, neglectful, or conditional care. A scammer later activates the same attachment system through intense attention, threatened withdrawal, intermittent reinforcement, and promises of permanent belonging.

After the crime and retraumatization: The offender’s disappearance or rejection reactivates earlier abandonment fears.

Effect on recovery: The victim craves contact with the person who caused the injury and interprets separation as emotional danger.

What needs to be done: Recovery requires no contact, attachment education, dependable supportive relationships, grief work, and repeated experiences of connection that do not demand surrender or payment.

Adverse Childhood Experiences Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: Adverse childhood experiences predate the scam and include abuse, neglect, household violence, addiction, incarceration, and instability. These experiences influence stress responses and beliefs about what treatment must be tolerated to preserve a relationship.

After the crime and retraumatization: Financial chaos, family rejection, threats, and emotional abandonment reproduce familiar instability.

Effect on recovery: The victim relies on survival strategies that once provided protection but now obstruct trust, help-seeking, and emotional regulation.

What needs to be done: Recovery must identify those strategies without condemning them, retain what remains useful, and replace harmful patterns with adult safety skills.

Relationship-Based Traumas

Interpersonal Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: A scammer deliberately creates trust and then uses that trust to control, deceive, frighten, or exploit the victim.

After the crime and retraumatization: Blaming relatives, dismissive professionals, predatory helpers, and new deceivers continue the interpersonal injury.

Effect on recovery: Human contact becomes associated with danger. The victim withdraws or becomes excessively compliant to prevent further conflict.

What needs to be done: Recovery requires safe relationships, gradual trust based on observed behavior, clear boundaries, and renewed confidence in evaluating other people.

Betrayal Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: Betrayal trauma develops when the offender becomes a trusted attachment figure and then uses that position to deceive, control, and exploit the victim. The scammer presents as a romantic partner, confidant, protector, or future companion while gathering information about the victim’s needs, values, losses, and vulnerabilities. Affection, promises, secrecy, manufactured emergencies, and intermittent withdrawal turn trust into the mechanism of the crime. Earlier abandonment, infidelity, family betrayal, abuse, or institutional mistreatment intensifies the injury when the scam appears to repeat an established pattern.

After the crime and retraumatization: Betrayal trauma continues when friends or relatives blame the victim, disclose private information, withdraw support, or attempt to control the victim’s decisions. Banks, platforms, law enforcement agencies, counselors, and service providers deepen the injury when they dismiss the crime, fail to communicate, break promises, or treat the victim as responsible. Recovery scammers create another direct betrayal by pretending to offer help while planning further exploitation. New relationships also reactivate the trauma when another person becomes secretive, inconsistent, controlling, or dishonest.

Effect on recovery: The victim loses trust in other people and begins to distrust personal judgment, memory, perception, and emotional responses. The victim repeatedly examines past conversations, searching for the moment when the deception should have become obvious. Some victims withdraw from relationships and assume that everyone has a hidden motive. Others surrender decisions to relatives or professionals because they no longer trust themselves. Grief becomes more difficult because the victim misses the emotional connection while understanding that the offender deliberately manufactured it.

What needs to be done: Recovery requires correct attribution of responsibility. The offender created the deception and exploited ordinary human trust. The victim must rebuild confidence through small decisions, verification, evidence, and repeated successful experiences. Healthy trust should develop gradually through consistency, transparency, accountability, and respect for boundaries. Trauma-informed counseling, recovery education, peer support, and dependable relationships help the victim recognize that trust was exploited, not defective, and that personal judgment remains capable of recovery and growth.

Moral Injury

Cause before or during the crime: Moral injury develops when the scammer manipulates the victim into acting against deeply held values, responsibilities, or beliefs about right and wrong. The victim lies to family members, conceals financial activity, borrows money under false pretenses, breaks promises, ignores warnings, or involves other people in the offender’s fabricated emergencies. Some victims recruit friends into fraudulent investments or transfer money belonging to a spouse, family member, employer, or organization. The offender creates urgency, emotional pressure, fear, and attachment, but the victim later judges these actions as though they occurred under ordinary conditions.

After the crime and retraumatization: Moral injury intensifies when relatives, employers, institutions, or authorities condemn the victim’s actions without recognizing the manipulation that produced them. Financial consequences repeatedly remind the victim of decisions that violated personal values. Discovering that transferred money supported organized crime or harmed other victims creates additional distress. Retelling the events also reactivates shame when the victim focuses entirely on personal actions while overlooking the offender’s deliberate coercion and deception.

Effect on recovery: The victim does not merely believe that a mistake occurred. The victim begins to believe that the crime exposed a defective character. Guilt centers on specific actions, while shame expands those actions into a judgment about the entire person. The victim withdraws, rejects compassion, resists help, and treats continued suffering as deserved punishment. This self-condemnation obstructs learning because every examination of the crime becomes another prosecution of the self.

What needs to be done: Recovery requires honest accountability without self-destruction. The victim must acknowledge harmful decisions while placing them within the conditions of manipulation, incomplete information, emotional coercion, and manufactured urgency. Restitution, apology, disclosure, or relationship repair should occur when appropriate and realistically possible. The victim must recommit to personal values through present behavior rather than permanent punishment. Education, counseling, self-forgiveness, and constructive action help transform moral pain into responsibility, growth, and restored integrity.

Attachment Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: Attachment trauma develops when the offender creates an intense emotional bond and then uses that bond to manipulate the victim. The offender manufactures intimacy through constant communication, affection, shared secrets, future plans, emotional mirroring, and claims of exceptional compatibility. Alternating warmth with distance, emergencies, conflict, disappearance, or threatened abandonment strengthens the attachment by keeping the victim focused on restoring emotional security. Earlier abandonment, bereavement, neglect, unstable relationships, or attachment injuries increase the emotional force of this pattern.

After the crime and retraumatization: Attachment trauma continues when the offender disappears abruptly, reveals cruelty, denies the relationship, or returns with apologies and renewed promises. Photographs, messages, music, anniversaries, routines, and places associated with the relationship reactivate the attachment response. Loneliness, family conflict, stressful events, and new romantic disappointments also renew the desire to reconnect. Offender recontact becomes especially dangerous because even a brief message restores hope and reactivates the established emotional cycle.

Effect on recovery: The victim experiences longing, grief, intrusive memories, searching behavior, emotional craving, and urges to contact the offender. The mind continues reaching for the person who previously supplied comfort, even though that person also caused the injury. This conflict produces confusion, shame, and repeated questioning about whether any part of the relationship was genuine. The victim also struggles to imagine a meaningful future because the offender occupied such a large place within daily routines, identity, and future plans.

What needs to be done: Recovery requires complete separation from the offender and consistent protection against renewed contact. The victim should remove avoidable reminders, change routines connected with the scam, and prepare a response plan for moments of longing or temptation. Education about manipulated attachment helps the victim understand that emotional craving does not prove the offender was genuine or that contact will provide relief. Grief processing, supportive relationships, structured activity, and gradual social reconnection help transfer attachment needs away from the offender and toward safe people, meaningful activities, and a life grounded in reality.

Relationship Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: The scam relationship contains deception, coercion, financial demands, isolation, emotional dependency, and repeated violations of trust.

After the crime and retraumatization: Dating, friendship, intimacy, or ordinary disagreement activates fear and suspicion.

Effect on recovery: The victim avoids closeness or monitors every interaction for deception.

What needs to be done: Recovery requires gradual relational exposure, realistic boundaries, verification without obsession, and recognition that discernment differs from permanent distrust.

Intimate Partner Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: This category applies when the scammer becomes a physical intimate partner, spouse, cohabiting partner, or continuing romantic presence. Financial control, coercion, threats, violence, and immigration exploitation intensify the injury.

After the crime and retraumatization: Separation disputes, stalking, legal proceedings, property conflicts, or child-related contact prolong exposure.

Effect on recovery: The victim faces emotional, legal, physical, and financial entanglement.

What needs to be done: Recovery requires coordinated safety planning, legal assistance, financial separation, protected communication, and specialized interpersonal-trauma support.

Sexual Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: This applies when the offender coerces sexual acts, obtains intimate images through deception, engages in nonconsensual image distribution, commits sexual assault, or uses sextortion.

After the crime and retraumatization: Threats to publish images, invasive questioning, online circulation, or victim-blaming reactions repeat the violation.

Effect on recovery: Shame, body alienation, fear, avoidance of intimacy, and loss of sexual autonomy interfere with healing.

What needs to be done: Recovery requires restoration of safety and control, removal of blame, evidence preservation, specialized counseling, and respect for the victim’s decisions about disclosure and intimacy.

Family Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: Earlier family trauma sometimes created unmet attachment needs. During the scam, the offender also drives conflict between the victim and relatives by demanding secrecy or portraying concerned family members as enemies.

After the crime and retraumatization: Anger, financial disputes, ridicule, surveillance, or rejection within the family intensify the harm.

Effect on recovery: The victim loses both the fraudulent relationship and the support network needed for recovery.

What needs to be done: Families need education about manipulation and trauma, respectful boundaries, communication repair, and a shared plan that supports without controlling.

Institutional Betrayal Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: Institutional betrayal trauma develops when an organization responsible for safety, protection, oversight, or assistance fails to prevent foreseeable harm or respond appropriately when warning signs appear. Social-media platforms, dating services, banks, payment processors, cryptocurrency exchanges, telecommunications providers, employers, and government agencies occupy positions of authority and trust. When these institutions ignore reports, permit fraudulent accounts to remain active, process suspicious transactions, or provide inadequate warnings, the victim experiences their failure as another layer of betrayal. Earlier experiences of institutional neglect, discrimination, or mistreatment strengthen this reaction.

After the crime and retraumatization: The injury deepens when institutions rely on automated responses, inaccessible procedures, fragmented departments, lost evidence, or repeated referrals that lead nowhere. Dismissive police contacts, blame-centered banking interviews, unexplained case closures, rejected reimbursement claims, and long periods without communication leave the victim feeling invisible. Repeatedly telling the story to different representatives also forces the victim to relive the crime without receiving meaningful recognition, protection, or assistance.

Effect on recovery: The victim loses trust in the systems expected to provide safety and justice. Reporting begins to feel pointless, humiliating, or dangerous. The victim withdraws from assistance, abandons legitimate claims, and interprets institutional silence as proof that the crime was insignificant or personally deserved. This response also damages recovery by increasing isolation, anger, helplessness, and fixation on obtaining recognition from institutions that operate under limited authority or rigid procedures.

What needs to be done: Recovery requires respectful advocacy, accurate procedural information, and realistic expectations about what each institution has the authority to accomplish. The victim should maintain written records, preserve evidence, document every contact, request reference numbers, and identify consistent points of contact whenever possible. Advocates should explain delays, limitations, appeal options, and probable outcomes without dismissing the victim’s need for justice. Most importantly, the victim must learn that institutional failure reflects the limitations or misconduct of the institution. It does not determine the seriousness of the crime, the legitimacy of the harm, or the victim’s worth.

Abandonment Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: Prior abandonment increases sensitivity to rejection. The scammer then uses threatened departure, silence, illness narratives, or emotional withdrawal to secure compliance.

After the crime and retraumatization: Ghosting, exposure of the false identity, exclusion from communities, or rejection by relatives repeats the abandonment.

Effect on recovery: The victim pursues contact, tolerates mistreatment, or avoids new relationships to prevent another loss.

What needs to be done: Recovery requires separation from the offender, tolerance of attachment distress, dependable human contact, and recognition that abandonment feelings do not require renewed contact.

Crime and Event-Based Traumas

Crime Victimization Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: The offender intentionally deceives and exploits the victim. The realization that another person deliberately caused the loss changes the experience from misfortune into victimization.

After the crime and retraumatization: Reporting, evidence review, prosecution delays, public exposure, and offender impunity keep the crime psychologically present.

Effect on recovery: The victim develops fear, anger, vigilance, distrust, and a powerful need for justice.

What needs to be done: Recovery requires victim recognition, reporting support, practical assistance, accurate information, advocacy, and a clear separation between personal healing and criminal justice outcomes.

Financial Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: Repeated transfers, loans, asset liquidation, retirement losses, debt, and financial coercion destroy security.

After the crime and retraumatization: Bills, collection calls, bankruptcy, housing changes, lost retirement plans, and dependence on relatives continue the injury.

Effect on recovery: Every financial decision becomes associated with shame and danger. Chronic financial stress consumes attention needed for psychological healing.

What needs to be done: Recovery requires an organized financial assessment, fraud containment, debt guidance, realistic budgeting, restored financial routines, and freedom from humiliating supervision.

Scam and Fraud Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: Scam trauma combines deliberate deception, psychological manipulation, financial exploitation, attachment injury, and destruction of perceived reality.

After the crime and retraumatization: Shame, public misunderstanding, financial consequences, repeated discoveries, offender contact, and recovery scams extend it.

Effect on recovery: The victim struggles with identity, trust, grief, reality testing, confidence, and meaning.

What needs to be done: Recovery requires scam-specific education, stabilization, grief work, trauma management, financial repair, social reconnection, and structured rebuilding of agency. Federal victim-service authorities recognize that fraud victims experience emotional and psychological harm in addition to financial damage.

Medical Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: Medical trauma does not automatically result from a scam. It applies when victimization triggers hospitalization, a medical emergency, medication complications, or severe health deterioration. Scammers also exploit existing illnesses and medical fears.

After the crime and retraumatization: Medical examinations, panic symptoms, hospital environments, or financial inability to obtain care reactivate distress.

Effect on recovery: Health sensations become threatening, and the victim avoids care or becomes consumed by health fears.

What needs to be done: Recovery requires coordinated medical care, clear explanations, predictable appointments, emotional support, and restoration of confidence in bodily safety.

Accident Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: Accident trauma is not inherent to scam victimization. It applies when the victim suffers a collision, fall, injury, or other accident during a scam-related crisis, escape, confrontation, or period of severe exhaustion.

After the crime and retraumatization: Driving, locations, physical pain, or insurance procedures reproduce the fear.

Effect on recovery: Physical limitations and accident reminders compound the scam-related trauma.

What needs to be done: The accident and the scam must be addressed as connected but distinguishable injuries through physical rehabilitation, trauma care, and practical support.

Disaster Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: Disaster trauma is separate unless the scam occurred during or exploited a hurricane, wildfire, flood, earthquake, displacement, or humanitarian emergency.

After the crime and retraumatization: Housing instability, rebuilding problems, insurance disputes, and disaster-related scams extend the exposure.

Effect on recovery: The victim faces simultaneous loss of safety, property, community, trust, and money.

What needs to be done: Recovery requires disaster assistance, stable housing, fraud support, community connection, and coordinated care rather than isolated services.

Combat Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: Combat trauma predates most scams. Offenders target veterans by exploiting military identity, loneliness, grief, survivor guilt, or familiarity with deployment narratives.

After the crime and retraumatization: Military impersonation, betrayal of service-related values, and institutional interactions reactivate combat memories.

Effect on recovery: Existing hypervigilance, sleep disruption, anger, guilt, or avoidance intensifies.

What needs to be done: Scam recovery must integrate existing veteran care, avoid treating all symptoms as scam-generated, and address the offender’s exploitation of military identity.

Threat-of-Death and Threat-to-Safety Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: Threat-of-death and threat-to-safety trauma develops when a victim believes that the victim or someone important to them faces serious injury, death, abduction, arrest, captivity, medical danger, or another immediate threat. Scammers manufacture emergencies involving military deployment, accidents, hospitalization, kidnapping, suicide, criminal prosecution, stranded travel, violent retaliation, or endangered family members. Sextortionists, financial criminals, and impersonators also threaten physical violence, exposure, arrest, deportation, or harm to relatives. The threatened event does not need to occur. The victim’s nervous system responds to the perceived danger as a real emergency.

Earlier experiences also influence this response. Previous violence, medical emergencies, bereavement, combat, disasters, childhood abuse, or unsafe relationships sensitize the victim to danger. The scammer identifies these fears and repeatedly activates them to create urgency, suppress reflection, and compel compliance.

After the crime and retraumatization: Threat-based trauma continues when offenders issue new threats, reveal personal information, contact relatives, create replacement accounts, or imply that criminal associates know where the victim lives. Unknown calls, unexpected visitors, account alerts, threatening news stories, and new scam attempts reactivate the original alarm. Reporting interviews also retraumatize victims when they require repeated descriptions of threats without providing clear information about safety.

Effect on recovery: The victim remains hypervigilant even after the immediate danger ends. Ordinary sounds, messages, financial alerts, and periods of silence trigger fear. The victim checks locks, monitors devices, avoids leaving home, loses sleep, startles easily, and repeatedly searches for evidence that the offender remains nearby. Concentration and decision-making decline because the nervous system continues allocating attention to survival. The victim also struggles to accept that the emergency was fabricated because the fear, urgency, and physiological response were entirely real.

What needs to be done: Recovery begins with a factual threat assessment that separates present danger from remembered danger. The victim needs concrete safety measures, protected accounts, preserved evidence, controlled communications, and a clear plan for responding to renewed contact. Once immediate safety has been established, recovery work must help the nervous system recognize that the emergency has ended. Grounding, regulated breathing, predictable routines, sleep restoration, physical movement, supportive human contact, and trauma-informed psychological care reduce persistent survival activation. The victim also needs repeated confirmation that reacting to a credible threat was a normal human response to deliberate criminal manipulation.

Terrorism Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: Terrorism trauma applies only when the victim previously experienced terrorism or when scam proceeds, threats, or narratives become directly connected with extremist violence.

After the crime and retraumatization: News, investigations, threats, or discovering a possible link between stolen funds and violent organizations intensifies fear and moral distress.

Effect on recovery: The victim feels responsible for consequences created entirely by criminals.

What needs to be done: Recovery requires clear responsibility attribution, factual information, specialized trauma support, and protection from speculative or sensational claims.

Torture Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: Torture trauma is not a standard feature of scams. It applies when a victim previously endured torture or when an offender inflicts deliberate severe physical or psychological suffering through captivity, threats, degradation, or coercion.

After the crime and retraumatization: Interrogation-like interviews, confinement, humiliation, and threatening communications reactivate it.

Effect on recovery: The victim experiences intense fear, dissociation, distrust, and sensitivity to authority.

What needs to be done: Recovery requires specialized torture-trauma services, control over pacing, interpreters when needed, and strong protection against coercive practices.

Captivity Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: Psychological captivity develops when the offender creates perceived entrapment through debt, threats, secrets, intimate images, family danger, or emotional dependency. Physical captivity applies in trafficking or abduction cases.

After the crime and retraumatization: Continuing threats, creditor pressure, and family control preserve the feeling that escape remains impossible.

Effect on recovery: The victim waits for permission, fears independent action, and struggles to recognize available choices.

What needs to be done: Recovery requires genuine safety, restored choice, practical escape from remaining control, and repeated exercises in independent decision-making.

Displacement Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: This applies when fraud forces a victim to sell a home, relocate, lose housing, migrate, or leave a community. It also affects refugees and displaced people targeted through immigration or resettlement scams.

After the crime and retraumatization: Unfamiliar surroundings, lost possessions, isolation, and unstable housing prolong the disruption.

Effect on recovery: The victim loses place, routine, community, and identity at the same time.

What needs to be done: Recovery requires housing stability, local social connection, restoration of routines, preservation of meaningful possessions, and practical assistance.

Traumatic Loss

Cause before or during the crime: The victim loses the imagined partner, promised future, money, security, identity, time, community, and confidence. Some offenders stage illnesses, deaths, kidnappings, or disappearances that produce genuine grief responses.

After the crime and retraumatization: Photographs, anniversaries, songs, locations, legal updates, and new revelations reactivate the loss.

Effect on recovery: The victim grieves someone who never existed as represented, which complicates social recognition of the loss.

What needs to be done: Recovery requires permission to grieve the experience without validating the false identity, memorialization of what was genuinely felt, and reconstruction of a future outside the scam narrative.

Traumas Classified by Method of Exposure

Direct Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: The victim personally experiences manipulation, threats, financial loss, betrayal, or coercion.

After the crime and retraumatization: Direct offender contact, financial consequences, interviews, and continuing identity abuse reinforce the exposure.

Effect on recovery: Memories remain connected to personal danger and loss.

What needs to be done: Recovery requires direct safety measures, emotional stabilization, structured processing, and restoration of personal control.

Witnessed Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: This applies when the victim witnesses another person being threatened, exploited, assaulted, arrested, or financially destroyed. Some scammers stage videos or calls depicting fabricated suffering, but the victim’s emotional reaction remains real.

After the crime and retraumatization: Replaying recordings or learning that other victims were harmed renews the distress.

Effect on recovery: The victim carries helplessness, horror, or guilt about failing to prevent harm.

What needs to be done: Recovery requires separating witnessed facts from manufactured scenes, correcting false responsibility, and processing genuine exposure.

Secondary Traumatic Stress

Cause before or during the crime: This usually affects relatives, advocates, moderators, counselors, and professionals who repeatedly hear detailed scam-trauma accounts. Survivors also experience it while supporting many other victims.

After the crime and retraumatization: Constant exposure to new stories reproduces emotional activation before the person has recovered from personal victimization.

Effect on recovery: The survivor absorbs additional fear, helplessness, intrusive imagery, and exhaustion.

What needs to be done: Support roles need limits, supervision, decompression, rotation, consultation, and protected time away from trauma material.

Vicarious Trauma

Note: This can affect both scam victims/survivors and those who aid and support them. In the case of professionals, advocates, and families, it can develop in the normal way of simply assisting victims. But it can also develop in already traumatized victims as they try to help other traumatized victims.

Cause before or during the crime: Vicarious trauma develops through repeated emotional engagement with the traumatic experiences of other people. It does not arise from the survivor’s scam alone, although personal victimization increases susceptibility to it. A recovering survivor encounters detailed accounts of manipulation, financial devastation, threats, suicide, family rejection, and institutional failure through support communities, private conversations, news coverage, or advocacy work. Professionals experience the same exposure while reviewing evidence, interviewing victims, moderating communities, conducting research, or providing continuing support.

After the crime and retraumatization: The injury develops gradually as the survivor or professional repeatedly absorbs other victims’ fear, grief, shame, anger, and helplessness. Each new story resembles elements of the original crime and reactivates personal memories. Reviewing messages, photographs, financial records, threats, and offender profiles creates continuous exposure to betrayal. Limited recovery time, weak role boundaries, excessive responsibility, and the belief that every distressed victim must receive immediate help intensify the psychological burden.

Effect on recovery: The survivor or professional begins to view deception as universal, relationships as inherently unsafe, and criminal exploitation as unavoidable. Emotional exhaustion, irritability, numbness, sleep disruption, intrusive thoughts, cynicism, and reduced empathy follow. Survivors neglect their own recovery while attempting to rescue others. Professionals lose emotional balance and begin carrying victims’ stories into their personal lives. Vicarious trauma also distorts judgment by making every unfamiliar person or ordinary inconsistency appear threatening.

What needs to be done: Recovery requires firm limits on exposure to traumatic material, scheduled breaks, workload boundaries, supervision, peer consultation, and protected time away from victim-support roles. Survivors need permission to participate without assuming responsibility for everyone else’s outcome. Professionals need case rotation, decompression practices, continuing education, and organizational support. Restorative activities, healthy relationships, ordinary routines, and deliberate contact with evidence of honesty, safety, competence, and human decency help restore a balanced worldview. Supporting victims remains meaningful work, but effective support requires enough distance to preserve the helper’s health, judgment, and humanity.

Transmitted Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: Earlier family trauma passes through fear, silence, overprotection, emotional unavailability, or learned beliefs about trust and danger. The scammer exploits these inherited patterns.

After the crime and retraumatization: The victim’s distress spreads through family relationships when fear, shame, and control replace open communication.

Effect on recovery: Family members react to one another’s distress and unintentionally maintain it.

What needs to be done: Recovery requires family education, honest age-appropriate communication, repaired routines, and an end to secrecy, blame, and panic-based decision-making.

Digital Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: The crime unfolds through messages, calls, photographs, videos, applications, payment systems, and social-media platforms. The victim’s phone becomes the location of attachment, crisis, manipulation, and loss.

After the crime and retraumatization: Notifications, friend requests, cloned accounts, unknown calls, online dating, and security alerts reactivate the threat.

Effect on recovery: The victim fears technology, compulsively checks devices, or abandons useful digital participation.

What needs to be done: Recovery requires account security, controlled notification settings, gradual digital reengagement, verification procedures, and separation between ordinary technology and offender-controlled interactions.

Group and Generational Traumas

Collective Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: Collective trauma applies when a large group experiences coordinated fraud, platform-wide exploitation, mass data theft, or a shared criminal campaign.

After the crime and retraumatization: Public exposure, institutional failure, continuing attacks, and repeated news coverage maintain group distress.

Effect on recovery: Shared suffering reduces isolation but also spreads anger, fear, rumors, and hopelessness.

What needs to be done: Communities need accurate information, organized mutual support, collective advocacy, responsible leadership, and boundaries against panic amplification.

Community Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: A community experiences trauma when scams repeatedly target its elders, immigrants, religious members, veterans, professionals, or cultural networks.

After the crime and retraumatization: Financial losses, distrust, secrecy, and accusations fracture community relationships.

Effect on recovery: Victims fear disclosure because they expect stigma or exclusion.

What needs to be done: Recovery requires community education, confidential support, responsible leadership, public rejection of victim-blaming, and visible accountability for offenders.

Historical Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: Historical trauma predates individual scam victimization. Communities affected by colonization, slavery, genocide, forced removal, or sustained persecution carry collective memories of exploitation and institutional betrayal.

After the crime and retraumatization: Dismissive institutions, discriminatory treatment, or exploitation by outsiders connects the current crime with historical experience.

Effect on recovery: The victim’s mistrust reflects both personal betrayal and collective history.

What needs to be done: Support must respect historical context, cultural identity, community strengths, and legitimate reasons for institutional distrust.

Intergenerational Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: Intergenerational trauma reaches the victim through family fear, silence, attachment patterns, survival beliefs, and unresolved loss.

After the crime and retraumatization: Shame, secrecy, financial dependence, or family conflict activates inherited responses.

Effect on recovery: The victim experiences the scam through family narratives about trust, money, authority, and disgrace.

What needs to be done: Recovery requires identification of inherited patterns, open family communication, preservation of healthy cultural strengths, and intentional interruption of harmful responses.

Racial Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: Racial trauma predates or accompanies the scam when offenders use racial stereotypes, fetishization, slurs, threats, discriminatory impersonation, or culturally targeted manipulation.

After the crime and retraumatization: Biased treatment by institutions, disbelief, media stereotyping, or community stigma deepens the harm.

Effect on recovery: The victim faces both criminal betrayal and injury to racial identity and belonging.

What needs to be done: Support must name the racial harm, reject discriminatory blame, respect cultural reality, and connect the victim with safe and culturally competent resources.

Cultural Trauma

Cause before or during the crime: Offenders exploit cultural expectations concerning marriage, family duty, religion, remittances, authority, honor, and hospitality.

After the crime and retraumatization: Community shame, family rejection, public exposure, or loss of cultural standing intensifies the injury.

Effect on recovery: The victim believes recovery requires choosing between personal truth and cultural belonging.

What needs to be done: Recovery must preserve cultural identity while separating healthy values from the offender’s manipulation and the community’s harmful reactions.

Related Psychological Injuries

Moral Injury

See above for more detail.

Cause before or during the crime: The offender coerces the victim into lying, hiding transactions, violating personal values, borrowing money, or involving other people. The victim later judges these actions without recognizing the manipulation surrounding them.

After the crime and retraumatization: Discovering how funds were used, recognizing harm to relatives, or facing condemnation intensifies moral pain.

Effect on recovery: The victim views personal actions as proof of being dishonest, weak, or morally defective.

What needs to be done: Recovery requires honest accountability without self-condemnation, restitution where appropriate, recognition of coercive circumstances, recommitment to values, and self-forgiveness grounded in changed behavior.

Traumatic Grief

Cause before or during the crime: The victim grieves the person, relationship, future, identity, and life direction created within the scam.

After the crime and retraumatization: Social invalidation complicates grief because others insist that nothing real was lost.

Effect on recovery: The victim suppresses grief, remains attached to the offender, or becomes trapped between knowing the identity was false and feeling that the relationship was emotionally real.

What needs to be done: Recovery requires recognition of the loss, structured mourning, removal of shame, and development of new sources of meaning and connection.

Compassion Fatigue

See Vicarious Trauma above.

Cause before or during the crime: Compassion fatigue does not usually begin with being scammed. It develops when recovering survivors devote excessive energy to rescuing other victims or when professionals repeatedly absorb others’ distress.

After the crime and retraumatization: Constant availability, crisis exposure, weak boundaries, and identification with every new victim produce exhaustion.

Effect on recovery: The person neglects personal healing, becomes irritable or numb, and loses the ability to provide effective support.

What needs to be done: The person needs role boundaries, rest, supervision, shared responsibility, protected recovery time, and freedom from the belief that compassion requires unlimited access.

Retraumatization

Cause before or during the crime: Retraumatization is not an original trauma category. It describes a new experience that reactivates, repeats, or deepens an existing traumatic injury.

After the crime: Common sources include offender recontact, recovery scams, blaming interviews, family ridicule, institutional dismissal, financial emergencies, social-media memories, anniversaries, cloned profiles, invasive questioning, and uncontrolled retelling.

Effect on recovery: Retraumatization restores fear, shame, helplessness, or attachment activation. It creates the impression that all recovery has disappeared.

What needs to be done: The trigger must be identified, present safety confirmed, nervous-system activation reduced, avoidable exposure limited, and the event processed within the existing recovery plan. Trauma-informed care emphasizes safety, trust, peer support, collaboration, empowerment, and the prevention of retraumatization.

What These Categories Mean for Scam-Victim Recovery

A scam victim rarely needs a separate recovery program for every label. These categories identify the different injuries that one crime produced. A victim might simultaneously experience acute discovery trauma, chronic manipulation trauma, betrayal trauma, attachment trauma, financial trauma, traumatic grief, digital trauma, and institutional betrayal. Earlier childhood or relationship trauma then interacts with these new injuries.

Effective recovery begins by identifying the active injuries rather than treating every reaction as one undifferentiated condition. Immediate danger requires safety measures. Financial trauma requires financial reconstruction. Attachment trauma requires separation and grief work. Betrayal trauma requires restored confidence in judgment. Digital trauma requires controlled reengagement with technology. Complex trauma requires staged psychological work. Institutional betrayal requires advocacy and realistic procedural support.

The central recovery tasks remain stabilization, education, emotional regulation, offender separation, grief processing, financial repair, social reconnection, identity reconstruction, and renewed agency. Peer support contributes safety, hope, trust, and collaboration, while appropriate trauma-focused psychological treatment addresses persistent trauma symptoms and distorted trauma-related beliefs.

Conclusion

Psychological trauma cannot be understood as one uniform injury with one predictable course of recovery. Its effects depend on what happened, how long the experience continued, when it occurred in the person’s development, who caused it, how it was encountered, and what happened afterward. Relationship scams bring several of these forces together through deception, attachment, betrayal, coercion, financial exploitation, manufactured danger, and the destruction of an intentionally constructed reality.

The end of the crime does not always end the traumatic exposure. Debt, offender recontact, identity misuse, family conflict, institutional dismissal, public misunderstanding, recovery scams, and repeated reminders extend or reactivate the injury. Earlier childhood adversity, attachment disruption, bereavement, discrimination, violence, or previous victimization also influences how the new trauma is experienced and processed.

Effective recovery depends on identifying the active injuries rather than treating every reaction as one generalized condition. Threat-based trauma requires safety and nervous-system stabilization. Attachment trauma requires separation, grief processing, and healthy reconnection. Betrayal trauma requires renewed confidence in judgment and relationships. Financial trauma requires practical reconstruction. Moral injury requires accountability without self-destruction. Institutional betrayal requires advocacy, documentation, and realistic procedural guidance.

Traumatological Anthropology provides a framework for understanding these injuries within the complete human environment. It recognizes the influence of identity, culture, family, institutions, history, morality, and social relationships. Recovery becomes more precise when each injury is recognized, its source is understood, and its continuing reinforcements are addressed. Healing then becomes an organized process of restoring safety, understanding, connection, integrity, agency, and trust in life.

Glossary

• Attachment System — The attachment system is the psychological process that drives a person to seek closeness, reassurance, protection, and connection with significant others. Scammers activate this system through constant attention, affection, emotional mirroring, and promises of permanence. Recovery requires redirecting attachment needs toward safe relationships and a life grounded in reality. — Attachment Mechanism
• Avoidance — Avoidance occurs when a victim stays away from thoughts, feelings, people, places, technologies, or activities associated with the crime. It reduces distress temporarily but prevents the mind from learning that many reminders no longer represent immediate danger. Recovery requires gradual and controlled reengagement with ordinary life. — Trauma Response
• Boundary Setting — Boundary setting is the process of establishing clear limits on access, communication, demands, responsibilities, and acceptable behavior. Scam trauma weakens boundaries when a victim associates refusal with abandonment, conflict, or danger. Practicing boundaries restores personal authority and protects developing trust. — Recovery Skill
• Coercive Control — Coercive control is a pattern of pressure, intimidation, isolation, surveillance, threats, and emotional manipulation used to restrict another person’s choices. Scammers use urgency, secrecy, guilt, withdrawal, and manufactured danger to direct a victim’s behavior. Recovery requires identifying these tactics and restoring independent decision-making. — Offender Manipulation
• Controlled Communication — Controlled communication limits when, how, and through whom information is exchanged during an active threat or continuing dispute. It prevents impulsive responses, preserves evidence, and reduces opportunities for renewed manipulation. A clear communication plan helps a victim respond from preparation rather than fear. — Safety Practice
• Correct Attribution of Responsibility — Correct attribution of responsibility places responsibility for deception, manipulation, and exploitation on the offender who designed and executed the crime. A victim remains responsible for present recovery decisions without accepting blame for another person’s criminal conduct. This distinction reduces shame while preserving constructive accountability. — Cognitive Recovery
• Cultural Memory — Cultural memory consists of shared understandings about historical events, losses, struggles, identities, and collective experiences. Families and communities transmit it through stories, traditions, beliefs, silence, and social practices. Cultural memory influences how a victim interprets exploitation, authority, trust, and recovery. — Cultural Context
• Decompression Practices — Decompression practices are intentional activities that help a survivor or professional disengage from repeated exposure to traumatic material. Rest, movement, quiet routines, recreation, reflection, and time away from victim-support work reduce accumulated emotional activation. Regular decompression protects judgment, empathy, and personal well-being. — Professional Wellness
• Denial — Denial is a psychological response that prevents full acceptance of painful or destabilizing reality. A scam victim might reject evidence, preserve belief in the offender’s identity, or minimize the extent of the exploitation. Recovery requires compassionate confrontation with verified facts and continued protection from renewed manipulation. — Cognitive Response
• Dissociation — Dissociation is a disruption in the ordinary connection between awareness, memory, emotion, identity, and surroundings. A victim might feel detached, unreal, emotionally absent, or unable to recall parts of the experience clearly. Stabilization and trauma-informed psychological care help restore present awareness and continuity. — Trauma Response
• Emotional Craving — Emotional craving is the intense desire to recover the affection, reassurance, attention, or connection previously supplied by the offender. It reflects an activated attachment system rather than proof that the fraudulent relationship was genuine. Recognizing the craving helps a victim tolerate it without resuming contact. — Attachment Response
• Emotional Numbing — Emotional numbing reduces access to feelings after overwhelming stress or prolonged manipulation. A victim might feel empty, detached, indifferent, or unable to experience pleasure, grief, or affection normally. Recovery requires safety, emotional identification, supportive connection, and gradual reengagement with meaningful experiences. — Trauma Response
• Emotional Regulation — Emotional regulation is the ability to recognize, tolerate, express, and manage emotions without becoming controlled by them. Scam trauma disrupts this ability through fear, shame, grief, anger, and continuing uncertainty. Regulation practice helps a victim respond thoughtfully instead of reacting from immediate activation. — Recovery Skill
• Financial Containment — Financial containment is the immediate process of stopping additional losses and preventing further access to money or assets. It includes contacting financial institutions, securing accounts, reviewing transactions, and ending unauthorized payment channels. Containment creates the practical stability required for longer recovery work. — Financial Recovery
• Grief Processing — Grief processing is the gradual recognition and integration of losses connected with the scam. Those losses include the relationship, imagined future, money, time, identity, confidence, and sense of safety. Healthy processing allows a victim to mourn what was emotionally experienced without validating the offender’s fabricated identity. — Emotional Recovery
• Grounding — Grounding uses present sensory information, bodily awareness, movement, and factual orientation to reduce trauma activation. It helps a victim recognize the difference between a current threat and a memory or reminder of earlier danger. Repeated grounding strengthens present awareness during triggers, intrusive memories, and periods of fear. — Stabilization Practice
• Healthy Trust — Healthy trust develops gradually through consistency, transparency, accountability, verification, and respect for boundaries. It differs from immediate confidence based on emotional intensity, promises, or manufactured similarity. Rebuilding healthy trust allows a victim to reconnect without abandoning judgment or personal safety. — Relational Recovery
• Helplessness — Helplessness is the belief or felt experience that personal action will not change danger, loss, or future outcomes. Prolonged manipulation, institutional failure, and repeated victimization strengthen this response. Recovery reduces helplessness through small decisions, completed tasks, reliable support, and visible evidence of personal effectiveness. — Trauma Effect
• Hypervigilance — Hypervigilance is a persistent state of heightened alertness directed toward possible danger. A victim might monitor messages, locks, accounts, strangers, devices, or relationship inconsistencies long after the immediate threat ends. Recovery requires factual safety assessment, nervous-system regulation, predictable routines, and gradual restoration of ordinary attention. — Threat Response
• Identity Reconstruction — Identity reconstruction is the process of rebuilding a stable understanding of self after deception disrupts confidence, values, roles, and future direction. A victim separates personal identity from the offender’s narrative and from the crime’s consequences. New activities, relationships, decisions, and values provide evidence of continuing growth. — Recovery Process
• Institutional Dismissal — Institutional dismissal occurs when an organization minimizes, rejects, ignores, or inadequately responds to a victim’s report or need for assistance. Automated responses, unexplained closures, inaccessible procedures, and blame-centered interactions intensify feelings of invisibility. Advocacy and procedural guidance help a victim continue without allowing institutional behavior to define the harm. — Institutional Response
• Intermittent Reinforcement — Intermittent reinforcement occurs when affection, attention, reassurance, or reward appears unpredictably between periods of withdrawal, conflict, or distress. Scammers use this pattern to intensify focus and keep a victim working to restore emotional closeness. Understanding the pattern helps explain persistent attachment after the crime. — Manipulation Method
• Intrusive Memories — Intrusive memories are unwanted thoughts, images, sensations, or emotional recollections that enter awareness without deliberate invitation. Messages, music, photographs, anniversaries, locations, and digital notifications trigger them after a scam. Grounding and structured trauma processing reduce their control over daily functioning. — Trauma Symptom
• Manufactured Emergencies — Manufactured emergencies are false crises created to produce fear, urgency, sympathy, and rapid compliance. Scammers use fabricated accidents, illnesses, arrests, kidnappings, travel problems, military dangers, and family threats to suppress reflection. Recognizing the tactic helps a victim slow decisions and verify claims independently. — Offender Manipulation
• Manipulated Attachment — Manipulated attachment is an emotional bond deliberately created and intensified for control or exploitation. A scammer uses intimacy, availability, mirroring, promises, withdrawal, and crisis to make the relationship feel indispensable. Education helps a victim understand why the attachment remains powerful after the deception is exposed. — Attachment Mechanism
• Offender Recontact — Offender recontact occurs when a scammer returns through the original identity, a new identity, an accomplice, or an apparent helper. The contact commonly uses apology, affection, threats, emergencies, or promises of repayment to reopen access. A prepared response plan protects a victim from renewed attachment and financial exploitation. — Continuing Victimization
• Peer Consultation — Peer consultation is structured discussion among professionals, advocates, moderators, or trained supporters who share responsibility for difficult cases. It provides perspective, reduces isolation, and identifies when emotional involvement has begun to distort judgment. Regular consultation supports ethical, consistent, and sustainable victim care. — Professional Practice
• Peer Support — Peer support provides connection with people who understand victimization through shared experience, trained service, or structured mutual assistance. It reduces isolation and helps normalize trauma responses without minimizing personal differences. Effective peer support strengthens safety, hope, knowledge, and participation in recovery. — Social Recovery
• Personal Judgment — Personal judgment is the capacity to evaluate information, recognize patterns, weigh risks, and make decisions. Scam victimization damages confidence in this ability because the offender controlled the information used during the crime. Small verified decisions help a victim rebuild trust in personal reasoning. — Cognitive Recovery
• Psychological Captivity — Psychological captivity develops when threats, debt, secrecy, attachment, fear, or coercion create the belief that escape is impossible. A victim remains behaviorally or emotionally controlled even without physical confinement. Recovery restores choice through safety, offender separation, factual information, and repeated independent action. — Coercive Manipulation
• Reality Testing — Reality testing is the process of comparing beliefs, impressions, and emotional conclusions with independent evidence. Scammers weaken it through secrecy, urgency, controlled information, and repeated emotional pressure. Recovery strengthens it through verification, consultation, documentation, and acceptance of facts that conflict with the fraudulent narrative. — Cognitive Recovery
• Safety Planning — Safety planning creates specific actions for responding to threats, offender contact, account compromise, stalking, sextortion, or identity misuse. It identifies trusted contacts, evidence procedures, communication limits, emergency steps, and institutional resources. A written plan reduces panic by replacing uncertainty with prepared action. — Safety Practice
• Self-Blame — Self-blame assigns responsibility for the offender’s deception and criminal choices to the person who was targeted. It grows when a victim judges earlier decisions using information learned only after discovery. Correct attribution of responsibility allows learning without accepting ownership of the crime. — Cognitive Distortion
• Self-Condemnation — Self-condemnation turns regretted behavior into a judgment that the entire person is morally defective or undeserving of recovery. It blocks help-seeking, learning, forgiveness, and constructive accountability. Recovery replaces permanent punishment with honest evaluation, changed behavior, repair, and recommitment to personal values. — Moral Injury Response
• Shame — Shame is the painful belief that victimization reveals personal inferiority, defectiveness, or unworthiness. It differs from regret because it judges the whole person rather than a specific decision or action. Compassionate education, accurate responsibility, safe disclosure, and social acceptance reduce shame’s power. — Emotional Response
• Social Reconnection — Social reconnection is the gradual restoration of safe involvement with family, friends, peers, communities, and meaningful activities. Scam trauma disrupts connection through secrecy, humiliation, distrust, and withdrawal. Reconnection rebuilds belonging while allowing boundaries and trust to develop at a safe pace. — Recovery Process
• Stabilization — Stabilization is the early recovery process of restoring safety, routine, sleep, emotional control, reliable information, and practical functioning. It reduces crisis activation before deeper trauma work begins. Consistent stabilization gives a victim enough internal and external structure to participate effectively in recovery. — Recovery Process
• Structured Activity — Structured activity uses planned routines, responsibilities, learning, movement, social contact, and meaningful tasks to support recovery. It limits unoccupied periods dominated by rumination, searching behavior, or urges to reconnect with an offender. Predictable activity restores rhythm, competence, and engagement with ordinary life. — Recovery Practice
• Survival Strategies — Survival strategies are behaviors and beliefs developed to endure danger, instability, neglect, coercion, or earlier trauma. They include emotional withdrawal, compliance, secrecy, vigilance, and excessive responsibility for others. Recovery identifies which strategies remain useful and replaces those that now obstruct safety, trust, and growth. — Adaptive Response
• Threat Assessment — Threat assessment is the factual evaluation of whether danger remains current, credible, specific, and actionable. It separates active risk from remembered danger, generalized fear, and criminal bluffing. Accurate assessment directs safety measures without allowing fear to control every part of daily life. — Safety Evaluation
• Trauma-Focused Psychological Treatment — Trauma-focused psychological treatment directly addresses traumatic memories, meanings, emotions, beliefs, and avoidance patterns. It helps a victim process persistent trauma symptoms within a structured professional relationship. Appropriate treatment supports deeper recovery when stabilization and general support do not resolve continuing impairment. — Psychological Care
• Trauma-Informed Counseling — Trauma-informed counseling recognizes how overwhelming experiences affect safety, trust, emotional regulation, memory, behavior, and participation. It avoids blame, unnecessary repetition, coercion, and practices that reproduce helplessness. Effective counseling supports choice, understanding, stabilization, skill development, and coordinated recovery goals. — Psychological Care
• Victim-Blaming — Victim-blaming assigns responsibility for a crime to the person who was deceived, manipulated, threatened, or exploited. It ignores the offender’s planning, controlled information, psychological tactics, and criminal intent. Victim-blaming increases shame, discourages reporting, damages relationships, and obstructs recovery. — Social Harm
• Worldview — Worldview is the broad set of beliefs through which a person interprets humanity, safety, trust, morality, relationships, and the future. Scam trauma and repeated exposure to other victims’ suffering distort this framework toward universal danger and deception. Recovery restores balance through evidence of safety, honesty, competence, and human decency. — Cognitive Framework

Sources & References

• American Psychiatric Association. 2022. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision, DSM-5-TR.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog/490020
• Bai, J., Ho, M.-H., Sung, H.-T., Hung, C.-S., and Tsai, J.-H. 2026. Mental Health and Psychosocial Sequelae of Fraud Victimization: A Systematic Review.
  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1805536
• Balcombe, Luke. 2025. The Mental Health Impacts of Internet Scams.
  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40566364/
• Brave Heart, Maria Yellow Horse. 2003. The Historical Trauma Response Among Natives and Its Relationship with Substance Abuse: A Lakota Illustration.
  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12733753/
• Brave Heart, Maria Yellow Horse, Josephine Chase, Jennifer Elkins, and Deborah B. Altschul. 2011. Historical Trauma Among Indigenous Peoples of the Americas: Concepts, Research, and Clinical Considerations.
  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22400458/
• Buchanan, Tom, and Monica T. Whitty. 2014. The Online Dating Romance Scam: Causes and Consequences of Victimhood.
  https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2013.772180
• Coluccia, Anna, Andrea Pozza, Fabio Ferretti, Fulvio Carabellese, Alessandra Masti, and Giacomo Gualtieri. 2020. Online Romance Scams: Relational Dynamics and Psychological Characteristics of the Victims and Scammers. A Scoping Review.
  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32508967/
• Cruz, Diana, Michael Lichten, Kristen Berg, and Patricia George. 2022. Developmental Trauma: Conceptual Framework, Associated Risks and Comorbidities, and Evaluation and Treatment.
  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.800687
• Djelantik, A. A. A. Manik J., Geert E. Smid, Anna Mroz, Rolf J. Kleber, and Paul A. Boelen. 2020. The Prevalence of Prolonged Grief Disorder in Bereaved Individuals Following Unnatural Losses: Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis.
  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32090736/
• Evans-Campbell, Teresa. 2008. Historical Trauma in American Indian/Native Alaska Communities: A Multilevel Framework for Exploring Impacts on Individuals, Families, and Communities.
  https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260507312290
• Felitti, Vincent J., Robert F. Anda, Dale Nordenberg, David F. Williamson, Alison M. Spitz, Valerie Edwards, Mary P. Koss, and James S. Marks. 1998. Relationship of Childhood Abuse and Household Dysfunction to Many of the Leading Causes of Death in Adults: The Adverse Childhood Experiences Study.
  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9635069/
• Isobel, Sophie, and Margaret Thomas. 2022. Vicarious Trauma and Nursing: An Integrative Review.
  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34799962/
• Kristensen, Pål, Lars Weisæth, and Trond Heir. 2012. Bereavement and Mental Health After Sudden and Violent Losses: A Review.
  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22397543/
• Litz, Brett T., Nathan Stein, Eileen Delaney, Leslie Lebowitz, William P. Nash, Caroline Silva, and Shira Maguen. 2009. Moral Injury and Moral Repair in War Veterans: A Preliminary Model and Intervention Strategy.
  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19683376/
• Naidoo, Rinisa, and Shabnam Shaik. 2024. “I Think Too Much”: Culture, Trauma, and Expressions of Distress.
  https://doi.org/10.22582/ta.v13i2.727
• Office for Victims of Crime, U.S. Department of Justice. 2000. Victims of Fraud and Economic Crime.
  https://ovc.ojp.gov/sites/ovc/files/pubs/OVC_Archives/reports/fraud/htmlfraud/index.html
• Pillen, Alex. 2016. Language, Translation, Trauma.
  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102215-100232
• Sarriá, Encarnación, Patricia Recio, Ana Rico, Manuel Díaz-Olalla, Belén Sanz-Barbero, Alba Ayala, and María Victoria Zunzunegui. 2019. Financial Fraud, Mental Health, and Quality of Life: A Study on the Population of the City of Madrid, Spain.
  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31489951/
• Smith, Carly Parnitzke, and Jennifer J. Freyd. 2014. Institutional Betrayal.
  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25197837/
• Stevens, Francesca, Jason R. C. Nurse, and Budi Arief. 2021. Cyber Stalking, Cyber Harassment, and Adult Mental Health: A Systematic Review.
  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33181026/
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 2014. SAMHSA’s Concept of Trauma and Guidance for a Trauma-Informed Approach.
  https://library.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/sma14-4884.pdf
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 2014. Trauma-Informed Care in Behavioral Health Services, Treatment Improvement Protocol Series 57.
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK207201/
• van der Kolk, Bessel A., Susan Roth, David Pelcovitz, Susanne Sunday, and Joseph Spinazzola. 2005. Disorders of Extreme Stress: The Empirical Foundation of a Complex Adaptation to Trauma.
  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16281237/
• van Mol, Margo M. C., Erwin J. O. Kompanje, Dominique D. Benoit, Jan Bakker, and Marjan D. Nijkamp. 2015. The Prevalence of Compassion Fatigue and Burnout Among Healthcare Professionals in Intensive Care Units: A Systematic Review.
  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26322644/
• Whitty, Monica T. 2012. The Online Romance Scam: A Serious Cybercrime.
  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22304401/
• Whitty, Monica T., and Tom Buchanan. 2016. The Online Dating Romance Scam: The Psychological Impact on Victims, Both Financial and Non-Financial.
  https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895815603773
• World Health Organization. 2024. Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Requirements for ICD-11 Mental, Behavioural and Neurodevelopmental Disorders.
  https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240077263
• World Health Organization. 2024. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.
  https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/post-traumatic-stress-disorder