Why Scam Fraud and Cybercrime Awareness Campaigns Fail and It Becomes Another Form of Scam Victim Blaming – 2024

In Reality, Almost All Awareness Education and Awareness Programs will Fail in Stopping Scams, Fraud, and Cybercrime, and it becomes just Another Form of Scam Victim-Blaming

Principal Category: Psychology of Scams

Authors: 
•  Vianey Gonzalez B.Sc(Psych) – Licensed Psychologist Specialty in Crime Victim Trauma Therapy, Neuropsychologist, Certified Deception Professional, Psychology Advisory Panel & Director of the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc.
•  Tim McGuinness, Ph.D. – Anthropologist, Scientist, Director of the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc.

Awareness campaigns are designed to educate the public about risks such as scams, fraud, and cybercrime, with the aim of promoting vigilance and safer behaviors. However, these initiatives often fall short of their intended impact. While they may increase knowledge, they fail to address the psychological, systemic, and behavioral vulnerabilities that make people susceptible to manipulation. Furthermore, these campaigns can foster a false sense of security, leading individuals to overestimate their preparedness, while simultaneously shifting the burden of prevention onto victims. This approach perpetuates a culture of victim blaming and neglects the systemic reforms needed to combat these crimes effectively.

To counter the rising tide of scams and cybercrime, a shift is needed from awareness-based education to comprehensive strategies that focus on behavioral change, systemic accountability, and sustained engagement. Stronger regulations, enhanced law enforcement, and victim support systems must complement public education efforts to address the root causes of vulnerability. Without this holistic approach, awareness campaigns risk remaining superficial, offering knowledge without the tools or structures to translate that knowledge into lasting protection.

In Reality, Almost All Awareness Education and Awareness Programs will Fail in Stopping Scams, Fraud, and Cybercrime, and it becomes just Another Form of Scam Victim-Blaming

What Are Awareness Campaigns and Their Underlying Basis?

Awareness campaigns are organized efforts designed to inform and educate the public about specific issues, risks, or behaviors that require attention or change. These campaigns aim to spread knowledge, encourage vigilance, and promote safer or more responsible actions among individuals and communities. From public health initiatives to cybersecurity warnings, awareness campaigns have long been a favored tool by governments, organizations, and advocacy groups to address widespread challenges.

The foundation of awareness campaigns lies in the belief that ‘knowledge is power’—specifically, that providing individuals with accurate information about potential risks will empower them to take preventive actions. This approach assumes that most harmful situations, such as scams, fraud, or cybercrime, result from a lack of understanding or awareness. By filling this perceived gap, campaigns aim to reduce vulnerabilities and equip individuals to make more informed decisions.

For instance, scam awareness campaigns may explain common tactics used by fraudsters, such as phishing emails or fake romantic entanglements, and offer advice like “Don’t share personal information” or “Verify before you trust.” The underlying assumption is that an informed public is a less vulnerable public, and that education alone can serve as an effective deterrent against manipulation or exploitation.

However, despite the logic behind them, awareness campaigns often fail to achieve their intended outcomes. This failure stems not from the lack of valuable information but from a disconnect between knowledge dissemination and actual behavior change. Simply knowing the risks does not necessarily translate into taking the right actions, especially when psychological, emotional, and social factors come into play. Understanding these dynamics is crucial to evaluating the true effectiveness of awareness campaigns and exploring alternatives that address the root causes of vulnerabilities.

The Myth of Prevention: Why Scam, Fraud, and Cybercrime Awareness Campaigns Fall Short

Awareness campaigns designed to prevent scams, fraud, and cybercrime are a common tool used by governments, corporations, and advocacy groups. These campaigns aim to educate the public about potential risks, warning signs, and best practices for avoiding victimization. However, despite these efforts, scams and cybercrime continue to escalate globally. Research shows that awareness alone is insufficient to stop these crimes, and the reliance on such campaigns often shifts responsibility to individuals, perpetuating a culture of victim blaming. This article delves into why awareness campaigns fail, the systemic failures they mask, and the significant harm they cause by focusing on education rather than actionable solutions.

The Limited Impact of Awareness Campaigns

Awareness campaigns are often hailed as the first line of defense against scams, fraud, and cybercrime. However, their impact is largely symbolic, with little evidence to suggest they significantly reduce crime rates. The problem is that we all have to create awareness programs even knowing they may fail simply because anyone saved from these crimes is worth the effort.

The Lack of Studies on the Effectiveness of Awareness Campaigns

Despite the widespread reliance on awareness campaigns to address issues such as scams, fraud, and cybercrime, there is a notable lack of rigorous studies that evaluate their actual effectiveness in changing behaviors over the short, medium, and long term. This gap in research creates a significant challenge in assessing whether these campaigns truly achieve their intended outcomes or if they merely provide surface-level education without addressing deeper behavioral issues.

Short-Term Impact

In the immediate aftermath of an awareness campaign, there is often a measurable increase in public knowledge about the targeted issue. For example, cybersecurity awareness campaigns may lead to a temporary rise in individuals recognizing phishing emails or using stronger passwords. However, these effects are often fleeting. Studies such as “Evaluating the Effectiveness of Phishing Awareness Training” (2019) have shown that while knowledge increases shortly after training, individuals often revert to risky behaviors within weeks or months. This highlights a critical flaw: awareness alone does not guarantee lasting change.

Medium-Term Impact

In the medium term, the effectiveness of awareness campaigns becomes harder to measure, as behavioral changes tend to fade without reinforcement. Research on health-related campaigns, such as smoking cessation programs, has shown that even with repeated exposure to awareness messages, relapse rates remain high without sustained intervention. Similarly, in fraud prevention, individuals who initially adopt safer practices may become complacent or forget the lessons over time. A study by The UK National Cyber Security Centre noted that cybersecurity campaigns often fail to sustain behavioral changes beyond a few months unless paired with ongoing engagement and practical tools.

Long-Term Impact

Long-term studies on awareness campaigns are even scarcer, but the available research suggests that their impact on behavior is often negligible unless coupled with systemic or structural changes. For instance, a 2017 review of crime awareness campaigns by the European Crime Prevention Network (EUCPN) found that while campaigns may raise initial awareness, their long-term success in preventing crime was limited. The review concluded that campaigns relying solely on messaging, without incorporating broader social or institutional support systems, were unlikely to create lasting behavioral shifts.

According to the EUCPN Study:

RAISING AWARENESS: AN ELEGANT PRINCIPLE

Crime prevention practitioners often have to make do with limited resources. Many are subject to some form of political pressure or constraints. They are expected to respond quickly to crime problems and to do something about them, but in reality often cannot develop comprehensive and integrated interventions. The result: preventionists opt for awareness-raising campaigns to inform people about crime. The underlying idea is simple: people act in accordance with the knowledge they have. If they do not behave the way we want, we have to give them more information. Someone who knows that cybercriminals exploit weak passwords will choose stronger passwords. When people are aware that burglars enter houses through open windows, they will close the windows when they go out. And someone who understands the health risks of drug use is less likely to actually use drugs. Makes sense? It would seem so. As such, crime prevention practitioners resort to information campaigns: door-to-door leaflets in a particular neighbourhood, public service announcements on television, and everything in between—posters, videos, social media ads. We intervene in school curricula to teach children a lesson, or take them somewhere so they can learn  something about crime and safety.

BUT DOES IT WORK?

In a word: rarely! Time and again, research has shown that knowledge about crime does not necessarily lead to a decrease in crime or victimisation—the idea underpinning the “awareness paradigm”. The principle may be elegant, it is also wrong. To understand why, we need to delve a bit deeper into what it is that determines human behaviour, including safety precautions and crime. The awareness  paradigm assumes that humans behave according to the (presumably) objective knowledge they have. In reality, human behaviour is influenced by a myriad of factors and psycho-social processes, including (subjective) knowledge, planned behaviour, rational choices, social norms, role models, and individual psychology. Campaign designers should take as many of these factors as possible into consideration. Solely focusing on knowledge transfer will often lead to ineffective or even harmful campaigns. In crime prevention, one adverse effect is that victim-oriented campaigns may increase the fear of crime rather than effectively reduce crime (risk) or harm. Indeed, ineffective crime prevention campaigns and campaigns that backfired one way or another have been covered in the literature  since the early 1980s—and it is somewhat surprising that we keep trying what we already know does not work.

Link to study

Key Issues in Measuring Effectiveness

The lack of long-term data on awareness campaigns stems from several key challenges:

• • • Difficulty in Tracking Behavioral Changes: It is inherently challenging to monitor whether individuals have internalized the lessons of an awareness campaign and incorporated them into their daily lives.
    • Absence of Control Groups: Many campaigns lack a control group for comparison, making it difficult to attribute any observed changes directly to the campaign.
    • Confounding Variables: Other factors, such as changing societal norms, technological advancements, or external influences, can obscure the effects of awareness campaigns.
    • Lack of Funding for Longitudinal Studies: Conducting long-term research requires significant resources and funding, which are often not allocated to evaluating awareness initiatives.

Calls for More Comprehensive Research

A study published in The Journal of Cybersecurity (2020) emphasizes the need for longitudinal research that examines not only knowledge retention but also sustained behavioral changes. The study argues that campaigns should be evaluated based on measurable outcomes, such as a reduction in scam victimization rates, rather than self-reported awareness levels.

Similarly, the RAND Corporation’s 2021 report on Public Awareness and Behavior Change calls for integrating behavioral science into campaign design and evaluation. The report highlights that understanding the psychological and emotional factors driving individual behavior is crucial to creating effective interventions.

The Way Forward

The current lack of comprehensive studies on the effectiveness of awareness campaigns leaves policymakers and organizations relying on anecdotal evidence or assumptions about their impact. To address this gap, future research should focus on:

1. 1. 1. Measuring Actual Behavioral Changes: Studies should track whether individuals take tangible preventive actions after exposure to campaigns.
      2. Assessing Longevity: Evaluations should consider how long the effects of a campaign last and what factors contribute to sustained change.
      3. Incorporating Behavioral Insights: Campaigns must be designed and tested using principles from psychology and behavioral economics to ensure they effectively influence behavior.

Without robust evidence of their effectiveness, awareness campaigns risk becoming superficial efforts that fail to address the root causes of vulnerability. Comprehensive research is essential to determine whether these campaigns are worth the investment or if alternative strategies are needed to achieve meaningful and lasting outcomes.

Awareness Fails to Translate Into Action

While awareness campaigns may succeed in educating the public about scams and fraud, they rarely result in actionable behavior change. Studies such as “What Works in Public Awareness Campaigns?” reveal that while public knowledge may increase, it doesn’t necessarily alter behaviors. Many people who are aware of scams still fall victim to them, highlighting a disconnect between knowledge and action.

The problem is compounded by the sophistication of modern scams, which exploit psychological vulnerabilities rather than ignorance. For example, phishing scams or romance frauds are tailored to manipulate trust, fear, or empathy, rendering even well-informed individuals susceptible.

The Pace of Scam Evolution

Scammers continually adapt their tactics to exploit new technologies, vulnerabilities, and societal trends. Awareness campaigns, however, are reactive and often outdated by the time they reach the public. This lag creates a perpetual cycle in which criminals remain several steps ahead of the prevention efforts.

Cognitive Overload and Desensitization

People are inundated with warnings, tips, and red flags from multiple sources, leading to cognitive fatigue. Overwhelmed by the sheer volume of information, individuals often ignore or forget key messages when faced with real-life scenarios. Additionally, repeated exposure to warnings can lead to desensitization, reducing the perceived urgency of the threat.

Systemic Challenges Ignored by Awareness Campaigns

One of the most significant shortcomings of awareness campaigns is their failure to address systemic issues that enable scams and fraud.

Weak Regulatory Frameworks

Scams thrive in environments where regulations are weak or poorly enforced. Financial institutions, tech companies, and telecommunications providers often fail to implement robust security measures, leaving consumers vulnerable. Awareness campaigns rarely hold these institutions accountable, instead placing the onus on individuals to protect themselves.

Inadequate Law Enforcement

The global nature of cybercrime presents significant challenges for law enforcement. Limited resources, jurisdictional hurdles, and the anonymity provided by the internet make it difficult to investigate and prosecute fraudsters. Awareness campaigns sidestep this issue, focusing on prevention rather than addressing the lack of accountability for perpetrators.

Failure to Address Root Causes

Scams and fraud often stem from broader issues such as economic inequality, lack of regulation, and technological vulnerabilities. By focusing on individual responsibility, awareness campaigns divert attention from the systemic changes needed to reduce crime at its source.

The Human Psychology of Susceptibility to Deception and Why Awareness Alone Fails

Humans are inherently social creatures, wired to trust, connect, and respond to social cues. While these traits are essential for building relationships and functioning in society, they also make individuals highly vulnerable to deception, social engineering, and psychological triggers. Scammers, fraudsters, and cybercriminals exploit these traits with precision, using a deep understanding of human psychology to manipulate their victims. Awareness campaigns, no matter how well-designed, often fail because they do not address the underlying psychological vulnerabilities or focus on driving long-term behavioral change.

The Psychological Basis of Susceptibility

Humans rely on cognitive shortcuts, emotional responses, and trust as essential tools for navigating a complex world. These traits, while generally beneficial, leave individuals exposed to manipulation:

1. 1. • Trust as a Default: Trust is a fundamental human trait necessary for societal cohesion. Most people instinctively trust others until given a reason not to. Scammers exploit this baseline trust by presenting themselves as authority figures, trusted organizations, or emotionally relatable individuals.

      • Emotional Triggers: Humans are highly responsive to emotional appeals, which scammers use to bypass rational thinking. Fear, urgency, greed, and empathy are common triggers. For example, a scam email threatening account suspension plays on fear, while a romance scam exploits empathy and the desire for connection.

      • Desire for Predictability: People prefer predictable patterns and outcomes. Scammers exploit this by mimicking familiar scenarios, such as job offers, bank communications, or emergency requests from family members. The familiarity reduces skepticism and increases compliance.

      • Social Proof and Authority: Humans are influenced by what they perceive others are doing or saying. Scammers use fabricated testimonials, impersonate authoritative figures, or create fake social cues to enhance credibility and reduce resistance.

      • Overconfidence and Ignorance of Biases: Many individuals are unaware of their cognitive biases, leading to overconfidence in their ability to spot scams. This blind spot often results in a failure to recognize manipulative tactics when they occur.

Why Awareness Campaigns Fail Without Behavioral Focus

While awareness campaigns aim to educate individuals about the dangers of scams and fraud, they often fall short because they target knowledge acquisition rather than addressing the root causes of susceptibility—human behavior and psychology.

1. 1. • Knowledge Does Not Equal Action: Awareness campaigns increase knowledge but do not inherently change behavior. For example, an individual may know not to click on suspicious links, but in the moment of receiving an emotionally charged message, they might act impulsively. Without addressing impulsive behavior, education alone is insufficient.

      • Cognitive Dissonance: Even when individuals are aware of scams, they may experience cognitive dissonance—holding conflicting beliefs or emotions. For instance, a person might recognize warning signs but rationalize continued engagement due to sunk costs or emotional attachment.

      • Lack of Continuous Reinforcement: Human behavior changes only with consistent and repetitive reinforcement. A single awareness campaign, even if impactful, cannot counteract years of ingrained habits or societal conditioning. Behavioral change requires sustained efforts, akin to public health campaigns against smoking or drunk driving.

      • Normalization of Risk: When scams and fraud are presented as common occurrences, individuals may normalize the risks and become desensitized to the warnings. This reduces the perceived urgency to adopt protective behaviors.

      • Complexity and Overload: Many awareness campaigns provide extensive lists of “dos and don’ts” that overwhelm individuals. Without clear, actionable steps tied to specific behaviors, people are unlikely to internalize and apply the information in real-life scenarios.

The Role of Cognitive Biases and Logical Fallacies in Undermining Awareness Campaigns

One of the overlooked reasons why scam, fraud, and cybercrime awareness campaigns often fail to achieve their intended outcomes is the influence of cognitive biases and logical fallacies on human decision-making. These psychological factors skew how individuals perceive and respond to preventive messaging, significantly reducing the efficacy of awareness efforts.

Specific Cognitive Biases Affecting Effectiveness of Awareness

Overconfidence Bias

Overconfidence bias—the tendency for individuals to overestimate their abilities—plays a significant role in undermining the effectiveness of awareness campaigns. Many people believe they are too savvy or knowledgeable to fall victim to scams, especially after exposure to crime prevention messaging. This bias leads to complacency, where individuals may neglect crucial safety measures, believing their awareness alone is sufficient protection.

For instance, someone who learns about common phishing scams may dismiss the possibility of being targeted by a more sophisticated or personalized attack. This overconfidence creates a false sense of security, leaving individuals vulnerable to exploitation despite their theoretical knowledge.

Optimism Bias

Optimism bias causes individuals to believe that negative events, such as being scammed, are more likely to happen to others than to themselves. Awareness campaigns often fail to account for this bias, which leads people to ignore or downplay the risks highlighted in the messaging. Even when individuals recognize the dangers, they may rationalize that they are not part of the “high-risk” group targeted by scammers, thereby disregarding precautions.

This bias is particularly problematic in the context of increasingly sophisticated scams that target diverse demographics. Optimism bias lulls individuals into a false sense of security, making them less likely to heed warnings or adopt protective behaviors.

Availability Heuristic

The availability heuristic is a mental shortcut that leads individuals to assess the likelihood of an event based on how easily examples come to mind. Awareness campaigns often rely on high-profile stories or vivid examples of scams to drive their message, but this approach can have unintended consequences. If individuals cannot recall a similar example in their own life or community, they may underestimate the risk of being targeted.

For example, a person who has never encountered a romance scam might dismiss the possibility of becoming a victim, even if the warning signs are present in their interactions. This heuristic distorts risk perception, weakening the impact of awareness efforts.

Confirmation Bias

Confirmation bias leads individuals to seek out information that aligns with their existing beliefs while ignoring evidence that contradicts them. In the context of awareness campaigns, this bias can cause people to dismiss messaging that challenges their assumptions about scams or fraud. For instance, someone who believes that only the elderly fall for scams might ignore warnings that scammers also target younger, tech-savvy individuals.

This selective perception reinforces misconceptions and prevents individuals from internalizing the full scope of risks, rendering awareness campaigns less effective.

Sunk Cost Fallacy

The sunk cost fallacy occurs when individuals continue investing in a course of action because of the resources they have already committed, even if it is no longer rational to do so. This fallacy is particularly relevant in scams where victims have already spent money, time, or emotional energy. Despite being aware of the scam, victims may persist in the hope of recovering their losses or salvaging their investment.

Awareness campaigns often fail to address this psychological trap, leaving victims susceptible to further exploitation. The sunk cost fallacy highlights the need for messaging that explicitly encourages disengagement and offers practical steps to exit harmful situations.

Normalcy Bias

Normalcy bias is the tendency to believe that events will unfold within the framework of what is familiar and normal, even in the face of warning signs. This bias can cause individuals to underestimate the seriousness of a threat, as they assume that scams or fraud are unlikely to affect them directly. Awareness campaigns that fail to challenge this bias risk being perceived as alarmist or irrelevant, reducing their impact.

For example, a campaign warning about identity theft might be ignored by individuals who believe their lives are too ordinary to attract such targeted attacks. This mindset leaves them unprepared and vulnerable.

For more information about Cognitive Biases and Logical Fallacies:

• • Psychology of Scams Catalog of Cognitive Biases
  • Psychology of Scams Catalog of Logical Fallacies

Impact on Awareness Campaigns

These cognitive biases and logical fallacies collectively diminish the effectiveness of scam, fraud, and cybercrime awareness campaigns in several ways:

1. 1. • Undermining Risk Perception: Biases like optimism and normalcy skew individuals’ understanding of their personal risk, leading them to dismiss preventive messaging.
      • Reinforcing Complacency: Overconfidence bias and the availability heuristic foster a false sense of security, reducing vigilance and preparedness.
      • Perpetuating Victimization: Biases like the sunk cost fallacy trap victims in cycles of exploitation, even when they are aware of the scam.
      • Distorting Messaging Reception: Confirmation bias causes individuals to selectively engage with messaging, weakening the overall impact of campaigns.

Addressing the Cognitive Challenges

To improve the efficacy of awareness campaigns, it is crucial to design messaging that accounts for these psychological factors. Strategies might include:

• • • Personalized Risk Messaging: Emphasizing diverse victim profiles and scenarios to counter optimism and availability biases.
    • Behavioral Nudges: Encouraging concrete protective actions, such as enabling security measures, rather than relying solely on general warnings.
    • Empathy-Centered Approaches: Addressing the emotional and psychological barriers that prevent disengagement, such as the sunk cost fallacy.
    • Repetition and Reinforcement: Using consistent messaging across multiple platforms to counteract normalcy bias and build long-term awareness.

By acknowledging and addressing the cognitive biases and logical fallacies that shape human behavior, governments and organizations can create more effective and impactful crime prevention strategies that go beyond traditional awareness campaigns. This approach not only strengthens individual defenses but also fosters a more resilient and informed society.

Awareness Campaigns as a Form of Victim Blaming

Shifting Responsibility to Individuals

Awareness campaigns subtly imply that victims could have avoided being scammed if they had been more vigilant or better informed. This narrative shifts responsibility away from governments, corporations, and law enforcement, framing crime prevention as a personal obligation.

For example, campaigns that emphasize recognizing “red flags” or avoiding risky behaviors place the burden on individuals to outsmart sophisticated scammers. This ignores the inherent power imbalance between resourceful criminal networks and everyday citizens, setting the latter up for failure.

Stigmatizing Victims

The focus on awareness perpetuates a culture of victim blaming. Victims are often seen as naïve, careless, or complicit in their victimization, discouraging them from coming forward or seeking support. This stigma compounds the emotional and psychological harm caused by scams, leaving victims isolated and ashamed.

Economic and Emotional Costs

Victims of scams face significant financial losses, often depleting their savings or going into debt to recover. The emotional toll is equally severe, with many victims experiencing anxiety, depression, and trauma. Awareness campaigns do little to address these realities, offering no recourse or support for those who have already been harmed.

Reduced Efficacy of Preventive Messaging

Another critical flaw in scam, fraud, and cybercrime awareness campaigns is their tendency to foster a false sense of security. These campaigns often convey the message that being informed is synonymous with being protected, which can lead individuals to overestimate their ability to avoid victimization. This misplaced confidence can, paradoxically, increase vulnerability to crime.

Overconfidence and Complacency

Awareness campaigns frequently emphasize education, such as recognizing “red flags” or understanding common tactics used by scammers. While knowledge is important, it is not equivalent to practical readiness. Many people, armed with what they perceive to be sufficient awareness, may lower their guard, assuming that they are now impervious to fraud.

This overconfidence can result in behavioral complacency, such as neglecting more concrete preventive measures like enabling multi-factor authentication, securing personal data, or thoroughly vetting online contacts. Scammers, aware of this dynamic, design their schemes to bypass even the most informed individuals by using sophisticated psychological manipulation or novel tactics that fall outside the scope of common “red flags.”

The Illusion of Preparedness

Crime awareness campaigns often rely on simplified messaging that fails to account for the complexities of real-world scenarios. For example, many scams are contextually sophisticated, leveraging personal details or emotional triggers to exploit trust. Victims frequently report that, despite being aware of scams, they fell prey because the circumstances seemed unique or legitimate.

This illusion of preparedness can discourage individuals from seeking additional safeguards or professional advice. Believing that they are already equipped to handle threats, people may overlook critical vulnerabilities in their personal or financial systems. Moreover, when these individuals do fall victim to crime despite their awareness, the sense of betrayal in their own judgment can deepen the emotional and psychological toll.

Diminishing Personal Vigilance

Awareness campaigns also run the risk of “awareness fatigue,” where repeated exposure to preventive messaging leads to desensitization. When people are constantly bombarded with warnings about scams or cybercrime, the messages can lose their impact, causing individuals to disengage from the topic altogether. This disengagement can manifest as a lack of vigilance, where people dismiss potential threats as overhyped or irrelevant to their personal circumstances.

Furthermore, some campaigns may inadvertently give the impression that vigilance is unnecessary for those who consider themselves less likely to be targeted. For instance, individuals outside perceived high-risk groups (e.g., the elderly or technologically inexperienced) might underestimate their exposure to scams, ignoring the reality that fraudsters adapt their tactics to exploit a wide range of demographics.

Broader Implications for Crime Prevention

The reduced efficacy of preventive messaging does not merely impact individual victims—it undermines the broader goal of crime prevention. A society that relies solely on awareness campaigns risks creating a false narrative that crime is preventable through education alone. This oversimplification neglects the systemic and technological factors that contribute to the proliferation of scams and fraud, perpetuating the cycle of ineffective responses.

To counteract these challenges, crime prevention strategies must move beyond awareness and incorporate proactive measures that address both individual vulnerabilities and systemic enablers of crime. Solutions such as stronger consumer protections, real-time fraud detection, and institutional accountability can provide the safety net that awareness campaigns alone cannot offer. By shifting the focus from messaging to meaningful action, society can reduce the risk of crime and restore public confidence in prevention efforts.

The Ripple Effect: Eroding Public Trust

Loss of Faith in Institutions

When awareness campaigns fail to prevent scams, the public’s trust in institutions promoting these campaigns is eroded. People begin to question the effectiveness of governments, financial institutions, and technology companies, particularly if these entities fail to take meaningful action against fraud.

Perception of Inequality

The focus on individual responsibility creates a perception that the system is rigged against the average person. Wealthier individuals or organizations often have access to advanced cybersecurity measures, legal teams, and financial resources, leaving ordinary citizens feeling unsupported and vulnerable.

The Dangers of the “Awareness Is Enough” Mindset

Neglecting Systemic Solutions

Over-reliance on awareness campaigns diverts resources and attention from systemic measures that could make a real difference. Governments and industries must invest in stronger regulations, better enforcement, and technological innovations that proactively deter fraud.

Enabling Scammers

By failing to address systemic vulnerabilities, awareness campaigns indirectly enable scammers to continue their operations. Criminals exploit loopholes in regulation and enforcement, knowing that public education alone is insufficient to stop them.

SCARS Institute’s Own Experience

The SCARS Institute (Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc.) has been supporting and educating scam, fraud, and cybercrime victims for more than a decade now. During that time we have educated more than 10 million scam victims about the dangers of scams, how to recognize them, and how to emotionally and psychologically recover from them.

We have launched a number of different awareness campaigns over the years with substantial support and deep education. We have launched awareness campaigns about victimization, spotting scammers, and recovery processes. We have launched awareness days, weeks, and months. We have also seen an endless parade of other awareness campaigns from governments around the globe, nonprofit NGOs, and private groups of advocates. While the authors and sponsors of these campaigns may disagree (mostly due to their ignorance of the real workings of awareness campaigns,) almost without exception they all fail.

How can we say they fail? Don’t they help some people avoid scams, fraud, and cybercrime? Let’s look at the objectives of awareness programs.

The Typical Objectives of Aware Education Programs

It does not matter if it is a governmental anti-scam campaign, a corporate internal campaign, or an advocate’s campaign, they all tend to follow the same set of objectives.

Crime awareness campaigns are designed to inform and educate the public about specific types of criminal activities and to encourage behaviors that reduce the likelihood of victimization. The typical principal objectives of a crime awareness campaign include:

1. Educating the Public About Specific Crimes

• • • • Objective: To provide detailed information about the nature, methods, and risks associated with certain types of crimes, such as scams, cybercrime, theft, or violence.
      • Goal: Increase the public’s understanding of how these crimes are carried out, who is most at risk, and the potential consequences.
      • Reality: scams, fraud, and cybercrime have grown at a rate of about 70-80% per year. Clearly, aware campaigns have all failed.

2. Encouraging Preventive Behaviors

• • • • Objective: To promote practical actions that individuals can take to reduce their vulnerability, such as:
        • Strengthening online passwords.
        • Avoiding sharing personal information with strangers.
        • Recognizing phishing attempts or fraudulent communications.
      • Goal: Empower individuals to protect themselves and their property.
      • Reality: the public, potential victims, and actual victims have not significantly changed their behaviors. In fact, as stated above, this has often led to a false confidence in their ability to spot and avoid these crimes.

3. Reducing Fear and Misinformation

• • • • Objective: To reduce unwarranted fear or panic by providing clear, accurate, and actionable information about crime risks.
      • Goal: Build public confidence by showing that there are effective ways to mitigate threats.
      • Reality: Reducing fear is a double-edged sword in that fear can cause more avoidance and apprehension reducing impulsive actions, where overconfidence has led to dramatic increases in victimization.

4. Increasing Reporting of Crimes

• • • • Objective: To encourage individuals to report crimes to the appropriate authorities promptly.
      • Goal: Improve law enforcement’s ability to respond to crimes, collect data, and hold perpetrators accountable.
      • Reality: After nearly 20 years of awareness campaigns, scams, fraud, and cybercrime reporting has remained stuck at below 10% and has not changed significantly. It is not limited by awareness, it is limited by fear, shame, self-blame, guilt, and the toxic judgmentalism of those in authority. The only way to overcome this is through more trauma-informed training.

5. Raising Awareness About Victim Support

• • • • Objective: To inform the public about resources and support available for crime victims.
      • Goal: Ensure victims know where to turn for help and reduce the stigma associated with being a victim.
      • Reality: Almost half of scam victims do not seek support due to denial. Another quarter gravitates towards amateur hate groups due to their anger resulting from the emotional harm caused by these crimes. The remaining quarter is confused by the explosion of amateur advocates providing bandaid-level support and obscuring real professional support and recovery programs – of which there are very few.

6. Changing Social Norms Around Crime

• • • • Objective: To address cultural or societal factors that may tolerate or enable criminal behavior, such as:
        • Combating the normalization of certain online scams.
        • Challenging attitudes that blame victims.
      • Goal: Create a community-wide culture of prevention and accountability.
      • Reality: Indeed, younger generations almost expect to be scammed and treat it as a normal part of life. The Changing Baseline Syndrome tends to instill greater tolerance for crimes over time until it hits a tipping point. However, competitive advocacy groups only confuse the issues.

7. Mobilizing Community Involvement

• • • • Objective: To encourage communities to work together in crime prevention efforts, such as:
        • Neighborhood watch programs.
        • Community policing partnerships.
      • Goal: Foster a sense of shared responsibility for public safety.
      • Reality: Most victims, even after becoming a victim will not effectively talk about their experience or these crimes due to embarrassment and shame.

8. Enhancing Awareness of Law Enforcement Efforts

• • • • Objective: To highlight the roles and initiatives of police or other agencies in combating crime.
      • Goal: Build trust between the public and law enforcement, encouraging collaboration.
      • Reality: As scams, fraud, and cybercrime have exploded, progressive anti-police campaigns have done extreme damage to public awareness and trust in law enforcement. Additionally, progressive and socialist governments have impacted the effectiveness of law enforcement in many ways.

9. Reducing the Incidence of Crime

• • • • Objective: To ultimately lower crime rates by equipping the public with the tools and knowledge to prevent victimization.
      • Goal: Create a safer community with less overall criminal activity.
      • Reality: The hard cold truth is that in the case of scams, fraud, and cybercrime, some awareness is having a marginal impact, but over all the only solution open is large-scale policy, law enforcement, and diplomatic enforcement to reduce these crimes. The public is simply incapable of effecting change ever when educated.

The evidence, what little is available, demonstrates a clear failure to meet objectives in awareness campaigns. However, that does not mean they should not be done. If we cannot affect the whole of society, at least they can affect small groups, and in the end, this has value.

A New Approach: Moving Beyond Awareness

To effectively combat scams and fraud, a multi-faceted strategy is needed—one that goes beyond awareness and addresses the systemic factors enabling these crimes.

Overview

Stronger Regulatory Oversight

Governments must enforce stricter regulations on industries that facilitate scams, including financial institutions, telecom providers, and technology platforms. Mandatory fraud detection systems, real-time transaction monitoring, and penalties for non-compliance are essential.

Enhanced Law Enforcement

Greater investment in law enforcement resources is critical to investigating and prosecuting fraudsters. International cooperation is particularly important in tackling cross-border cybercrime.

Victim Support Systems

Victims of scams need comprehensive support, including financial restitution, counseling, and streamlined reporting mechanisms. Removing the stigma of victimhood is essential to encourage reporting and improve collective responses to fraud.

Collaborative Public-Private Partnerships

Governments, industries, and advocacy groups must collaborate to create cohesive strategies that combine education, enforcement, and victim support. Public awareness campaigns should complement, not replace, systemic measures.

The Need for Behavioral Change Over Education Alone

To truly protect individuals from deception, awareness campaigns must evolve into comprehensive behavioral change programs. These initiatives should not just inform but actively shape and reinforce safer behaviors over time.

1. 1. • Building Habitual Defenses: Behavioral change focuses on embedding protective actions as habits. For example, rather than merely warning about phishing scams, campaigns could teach and reinforce the habit of verifying sender information or hovering over links before clicking.

      • Leveraging Behavioral Science: Techniques like nudging—subtle interventions that guide decision-making—can encourage protective behaviors. For instance, defaulting to two-factor authentication or incorporating warnings directly into email interfaces can preempt risky actions.

      • Continuous Engagement: Just as health campaigns require sustained efforts to shift public behavior, anti-scam initiatives must offer ongoing training, reminders, and real-world simulations to keep individuals alert and prepared.

      • Emotional Resilience Training: Educating individuals on how scammers manipulate emotions and teaching strategies to remain calm and skeptical in high-pressure situations can reduce impulsive decisions. For example, creating awareness around how urgency triggers fear and how to pause and evaluate can significantly lower susceptibility.

      • Gamification and Interactive Learning: Traditional awareness messaging often lacks engagement. Interactive methods, such as simulations, gamified learning, or role-playing scenarios, can make lessons more memorable and effective by allowing individuals to experience and practice responses in a safe environment.

      • Incentivizing Protective Behaviors: Behavioral economics principles suggest that rewarding individuals for proactive security measures, such as recognizing scam attempts or implementing protective tools, can increase compliance and long-term adoption.

A Call for a Holistic Approach

To make meaningful progress in combating scams, fraud, and cybercrime, a shift is needed from purely educational campaigns to a holistic strategy that integrates behavioral science, continuous reinforcement, and practical interventions. Governments, organizations, and communities must work together to foster environments where safe behaviors are not just encouraged but normalized and easy to adopt.

Only by addressing the psychological foundations of human susceptibility and committing to long-term behavioral transformation can society hope to reduce the devastating impacts of scams and fraud. The challenge is not just to make people aware but to make them prepared—armed not only with knowledge but also with habits and strategies that actively protect them in an increasingly deceptive world.

Summary: Awareness Campaigns and Their Limitations in Combating Scams, Fraud, and Cybercrime

Awareness campaigns aim to educate the public about potential risks and promote safer behaviors. These initiatives are widely adopted as a primary tool to combat scams, fraud, and cybercrime, operating on the assumption that knowledge leads to preventive action. However, the reality is far more complex. Despite their prevalence, these campaigns often fail to deliver meaningful results, largely due to inherent limitations in their design and execution.

While these campaigns provide valuable information, they struggle to address the psychological, systemic, and behavioral factors that make people susceptible to manipulation. They often foster a false sense of security, fail to result in lasting behavior change, and inadvertently shift the responsibility for prevention onto victims, perpetuating a culture of victim blaming.

Awareness campaigns alone are not enough to combat the rising tide of scams, fraud, and cybercrime. While they play a role in educating the public, their overemphasis on individual responsibility perpetuates a culture of victim blaming and diverts attention from systemic failures. To create meaningful change, society must move beyond awareness and focus on actionable solutions, including stronger regulations, better enforcement, and robust victim support systems. Only by addressing these root causes can we hope to reduce the prevalence and impact of scams in an increasingly interconnected world.

To effectively address the growing threat of scams and cybercrime, a more comprehensive approach is needed—one that integrates behavioral science, systemic reform, and continuous engagement to drive meaningful and lasting change. 

References

• Phishing attacks: defending your organisation. (2024). ncsc.gov.uk. https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/phishing
• 2011_Mythbuster_LR_1.pdf. (2022). eucpn.org. https://eucpn.org/sites/default/files/document/files/2011_Mythbuster_LR_1.pdf
• “Evaluating the Effectiveness of Phishing Awareness Training” (2019) Assessing the efficacy of phishing awareness training is less likely when phishing and related social engineering attempts occur. researchgate.net Dec 13, 2023
• WJARR-2024-2538.pdf. (2024). wjarr.com. https://wjarr.com/sites/default/files/WJARR-2024-2538.pdf
• Shanee Dawkins. (2023). Phishing With a Net: The NIST Phish Scale and Cybersecurity Awareness. NIST. https://www.nist.gov/publications/phishing-net-nist-phish-scale-and-cybersecurity-awareness

Please Leave Us Your Comment
Also, tell us of any topics we might have missed.

Thank you for your comment. You may receive an email to follow up. We never share your data with marketers.

Recent Reader Comments

• on Why Scam Fraud and Cybercrime Awareness Campaigns Fail and It Becomes Another Form of Scam Victim Blaming – 2024: “Excelente artículo muy bien explicado abordando puntos importantes para crear campañas funcionales en la conciencializacion contra las estafas.” Nov 19, 01:37
• on Secrets Can Be Deadly For Scam Victims – Recovery Psychology 2023: “Sharing my experiences with those I trust have made the recovery journey possible and less stressful.” Oct 14, 15:59
• on Psychological Denial – A Maladaptive Coping Mechanism In Scam Victims – 2024: “Shock and Disbelief was a big part of my initial response when I discovered I had been scammed. It lasted…” Sep 28, 09:54
• on Reductive Thinking – A Maladaptive Coping Mechanism – An Enemy Of Scam Victims Recovery – 2024: “Reductive thinking and minimizing certainty was tempting but it doesn’t take much to understand that recovery from being scammed is…” Sep 26, 10:17
• on Victim Complex/Victim Mentality In Relationship Scam Victims 2023: “Reading this article, helped me to understand my mother’s behavior. While she was alive, she manifested that her unhappiness was…” Sep 23, 12:07

Important Information for New Scam Victims

Please visit www.ScamVictimsSupport.org – a SCARS Website for New Scam Victims Enroll in SCARS Scam Survivor’s School for FREE – visit www.SCARSeducation.org to register – FREE for scam victims/survivors If you are looking for local trauma counselors please visit counseling.AgainstScams.org or join SCARS for our counseling/therapy benefit: membership.AgainstScams.org If you need to speak with someone now, you can dial 988 in the U.S. or Canada, or find phone numbers for crisis hotlines all around the world here: www.opencounseling.com/suicide-hotlines

A Question of Trust

At the SCARS Institute, we invite you to do your own research on the topics we speak about and publish, Our team investigates the subject being discussed, especially when it comes to understanding the scam victims-survivors experience. You can do Google searches but in many cases, you will have to wade through scientific papers and studies. However, remember that biases and perspectives matter and influence the outcome. Regardless, we encourage you to explore these topics as thoroughly as you can for your own awareness.

Statement About Victim Blaming

Some of our articles discuss various aspects of victims. This is both about better understanding victims (the science of victimology) and their behaviors and psychology. This helps us to educate victims/survivors about why these crimes happened and to not blame themselves, better develop recovery programs, and to help victims avoid scams in the future. At times this may sound like blaming the victim, but it does not blame scam victims, we are simply explaining the hows and whys of the experience victims have.

These articles, about the Psychology of Scams or Victim Psychology – meaning that all humans have psychological or cognitive characteristics in common that can either be exploited or work against us – help us all to understand the unique challenges victims face before, during, and after scams, fraud, or cybercrimes. These sometimes talk about some of the vulnerabilities the scammers exploit. Victims rarely have control of them or are even aware of them, until something like a scam happens and then they can learn how their mind works and how to overcome these mechanisms.

Articles like these help victims and others understand these processes and how to help prevent them from being exploited again or to help them recover more easily by understanding their post-scam behaviors. Learn more about the Psychology of Scams at www.ScamPsychology.org

SCARS Resources:

• • For New Victims of Relationship Scams www.ScamVictimsSupport.org
  • Enroll in SCARS Scam Survivor’s School for FREE – visit www.SCARSeducation.org to register – FREE for scam victims/survivors
  • Sign up for SCARS professional Support & Recovery Groups, visit support.AgainstScams.org
  • Find competent Trauma Counselors or Therapists, visit counseling.AgainstScams.org
  • Become a SCARS Member and get free counseling benefits, visit membership.AgainstScams.org
  • Report each and every crime, learn how to at reporting.AgainstScams.org
  • Learn More about Scams & Scammers at RomanceScamsNOW.com and ScamsNOW.com
  • Scammer Photos on ScammerPhotos.com [Not Recommended for Recent Scam Victims]
  • SCARS Videos youtube.AgainstScams.org
  • Self-Help Books for Scam Victims are at shop.AgainstScams.org

 

A Note About Labeling!

We often use the term ‘scam victim’ in our articles, but this is a convenience to help those searching for information in search engines like Google. It is just a convenience and has no deeper meaning. If you have come through such an experience, YOU are a Survivor! It was not your fault. You are not alone! Axios!

Statement About Victim Blaming

Some of our articles discuss various aspects of victims. This is both about better understanding victims (the science of victimology) and their behaviors and psychology. This helps us to educate victims/survivors about why these crimes happened and to not blame themselves, better develop recovery programs, and to help victims avoid scams in the future. At times this may sound like blaming the victim, but it does not blame scam victims, we are simply explaining the hows and whys of the experience victims have.

These articles, about the Psychology of Scams or Victim Psychology – meaning that all humans have psychological or cognitive characteristics in common that can either be exploited or work against us – help us all to understand the unique challenges victims face before, during, and after scams, fraud, or cybercrimes. These sometimes talk about some of the vulnerabilities the scammers exploit. Victims rarely have control of them or are even aware of them, until something like a scam happens and then they can learn how their mind works and how to overcome these mechanisms.

Articles like these help victims and others understand these processes and how to help prevent them from being exploited again or to help them recover more easily by understanding their post-scam behaviors. Learn more about the Psychology of Scams at www.ScamPsychology.org

Psychology Disclaimer:

All articles about psychology, neurology, and the human brain on this website are for information & education only

The information provided in these articles is intended for educational and self-help purposes only and should not be construed as a substitute for professional therapy or counseling.

While any self-help techniques outlined herein may be beneficial for scam victims seeking to recover from their experience and move towards recovery, it is important to consult with a qualified mental health professional before initiating any course of action. Each individual’s experience and needs are unique, and what works for one person may not be suitable for another.

Additionally, any approach may not be appropriate for individuals with certain pre-existing mental health conditions or trauma histories. It is advisable to seek guidance from a licensed therapist or counselor who can provide personalized support, guidance, and treatment tailored to your specific needs.

If you are experiencing significant distress or emotional difficulties related to a scam or other traumatic event, please consult your doctor or mental health provider for appropriate care and support.

Also, please read our SCARS Institute Statement About Professional Care for Scam Victims – here

If you are in crisis, feeling desperate, or in despair please call 988 or your local crisis hotline.

-/ 30 /-

What do you think about this?

Please share your thoughts in a comment below!