Selective Attention and Perception Filtering in Scam Victims

Principal Category: Scam Victim Psychology

Authors:
•  Vianey Gonzalez B.Sc(Psych) – Licensed Psychologist Specialty in Crime Victim Trauma Therapy, Neuropsychologist, Certified Deception Professional, Psychology Advisory Panel & Director of the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc.
•  Tim McGuinness, Ph.D. – Anthropologist, Scientist, Director of the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc.

Profoundly traumatized scam victims often exhibit altered cognitive processes like selective attention and perceptual filtering, which can deeply affect their ability to perceive and process information during and after the scam. During the scam, victims may focus exclusively on the scammer’s manipulative narrative, filtering out warnings from loved ones. After the scam, selective attention can cause victims to fixate on feelings of shame or anger, rejecting help or resources for recovery. Bottom-up (automatic) emotional triggers and top-down (conscious) self-blame work together to entrap victims, complicating their healing process. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for guiding them toward recovery.

Selective Attention and Perception Filtering in Scam Victims - 2024

How Selective Attention and Perceptual Filtering Operate in the Minds of Profoundly Traumatized Scam Victims

Traumatic experiences, like being scammed, can profoundly alter how the brain processes information. Scam victims, particularly those who have been emotionally manipulated, often develop heightened mechanisms of selective attention and perceptual filtering to cope with or manage their trauma. These mechanisms, while generally protective in nature, can lead to difficulty processing or responding to outside information—especially if it challenges their current beliefs or emotional states. Below, we explore how the brains of profoundly traumatized scam victims apply these cognitive functions in multiple contexts, both during the scam and in its aftermath.

Selective Attention and Perceptual Filtering Defined

Selective attention refers to the brain’s ability to focus on certain stimuli while ignoring others. This allows us to concentrate on what seems most important at a given moment while tuning out distractions. Perceptual filtering is a related concept, where the brain selectively processes sensory information, discarding irrelevant input and retaining only what aligns with current priorities or expectations.

When scam victims are traumatized, these cognitive mechanisms may work in ways that are counterproductive to their well-being. Instead of filtering out irrelevant distractions, the brain might prioritize emotionally charged or fear-based stimuli, while suppressing critical information that could lead to recovery or clarity.

Attentional selection refers to the cognitive process by which the brain prioritizes and focuses on specific stimuli or information while ignoring others. This helps individuals concentrate on what is most relevant or important at a given moment, filtering out distractions. Attentional selection can be driven either by top-down processes (goal-directed, voluntary attention based on an individual’s intentions) or by bottom-up processes (stimuli-driven, where certain external factors capture attention due to their salience or novelty). This mechanism allows efficient navigation and decision-making in complex environments.

Selective attention, perception filtering, and attentional selection are interconnected processes that help the brain focus on relevant information while ignoring distractions.

  • Selective attention is the overall ability to concentrate on specific stimuli.
  • Perception filtering narrows sensory input, processing only what’s important based on goals or the environment.
  • Attentional selection is the mechanism through which the brain chooses which stimuli to prioritize, either consciously (top-down) or through automatic responses to salient information (bottom-up).

Together, these processes help manage the brain’s limited cognitive resources effectively.

A person’s level of awareness and control over selective attention, perception filtering, and attentional selection varies depending on whether the processes are top-down or bottom-up.

  1. Top-Down Control (Conscious): In goal-directed tasks, individuals have a high degree of awareness and control. They can intentionally focus on specific stimuli based on their goals, such as reading or listening in a noisy environment.

  2. Bottom-Up Control (Automatic): In this case, awareness and control are low. Stimuli like loud sounds or flashing lights capture attention automatically, driven by the brain’s instinctive response to salient information.

Thus, selective attention and attentional selection are often a blend of both conscious control and automatic responses. See more below.

Context 1: During the Scam – Ignoring Warnings

During a scam, victims often show a strong capacity for selective attention, focusing almost exclusively on the narrative created by the scammer while filtering out conflicting information from loved ones or outside sources. This is partly because scammers are experts at emotional manipulation, making victims feel understood, loved, or needed. The victim’s brain, attuned to the scammer’s cues, prioritizes these emotional bonds over any evidence that contradicts their trust in the relationship.

  • Example of Selective Attention: Family members or friends may try to intervene, warning the victim that they are likely being scammed. Despite clear signs of fraud, the victim’s brain may filter out these warnings, choosing instead to focus on the reassuring messages from the scammer. The victim’s selective attention locks onto the perceived “positive” aspects of the relationship, while perceptual filtering eliminates negative input that could shatter the illusion.

  • Emotional Factors: Scam victims often experience emotional investment, attachment, or feelings of validation from the scammer. This emotional influence strongly shapes selective attention. When family members offer well-meaning advice, it threatens the victim’s emotional reality, causing the brain to block out such input to protect the current belief system.

Context 2: After the Scam – Refusing to Acknowledge the Scam

Once the scam ends, either by the victim realizing the truth or the scammer disappearing, selective attention and perceptual filtering can persist, affecting the victim’s ability to process their traumatic experience fully. In many cases, victims may continue to filter out information that challenges their current emotional state or beliefs, such as admitting that they were scammed or accepting the financial and emotional damage done.

  • Denial and Cognitive Dissonance: Victims often experience cognitive dissonance, a psychological conflict between their prior belief (that the relationship or opportunity was real) and the new evidence that they were deceived. To reduce the discomfort caused by this dissonance, victims may suppress or filter out information that forces them to face the harsh reality. They may focus on feelings of betrayal and loss while avoiding steps to understand how the scam worked or how they might recover.

  • Refusal to Accept Help: Trauma can cause victims to avoid helpful resources. For example, victims may ignore advice from professionals or support groups who suggest focusing on healing and moving forward. Instead, their selective attention may remain fixated on their anger, shame, or hatred toward the scammer, while filtering out any messages that encourage forgiveness, recovery, or emotional processing.

Context 3: Clinging to Anger and Hatred Post-Scam

In the aftermath of a scam, victims often feel intense emotions such as anger, shame, and hatred toward both the scammer and themselves. Selective attention may keep victims focused on these negative emotions as a way of dealing with the pain, while filtering out guidance or advice that suggests a path toward recovery or healing.

  • Fixation on Negative Emotions: Victims may continue to direct their mental energy toward anger or hatred long after the scam has ended. Selective attention traps the mind in a cycle of re-living the trauma, replaying events, and blaming either the scammer or themselves for what happened. This emotional fixation can prevent victims from taking active steps toward mental and emotional recovery, as their perceptual filter blocks out any positive messages that might challenge their current emotional state.

  • Resistance to Letting Go: Letting go of anger and hate can feel threatening to victims because it involves acknowledging the full extent of the scam’s emotional damage. Perceptual filtering might cause victims to reject efforts from family, friends, or counselors who urge them to process their trauma and move forward, as this advice may conflict with the victim’s need to feel validated in their pain.

Context 4: Recovery Stages – Struggling with Self-Blame

At different stages of recovery, scam victims often struggle with profound feelings of guilt and self-blame. Their selective attention may hyperfocus on their perceived failures—such as “falling for the scam”—while filtering out external reassurance or the reality that scammers are manipulative and skilled at deceiving even the most intelligent individuals.

  • Self-Blame and Selective Attention: During recovery, victims often replay the scam in their minds, thinking about what they “should have seen” or “should have done differently.” Their selective attention locks onto these moments of perceived failure, while perceptual filtering suppresses the fact that the scam was a sophisticated and well-orchestrated manipulation. This focus on self-blame can hinder the recovery process, as it prevents victims from accepting support or recognizing the role of external factors in their victimization.

  • Missing Opportunities for Recovery: Victims may overlook opportunities for growth, healing, or community support because their perceptual filter is still colored by feelings of shame or guilt. They may reject offers to participate in support groups, therapy, or educational programs, as their selective attention remains fixated on their emotional pain rather than solutions for recovery.

Top-Down and Bottom-Up Processes in Scam Victims: Before and After the Scam

Scam victims experience significant cognitive and emotional shifts, influenced by top-down and bottom-up attention processes both during and after the scam.

During the Scam

    • Top-Down (Conscious): Victims often focus on the scammer’s manipulative narrative, driven by desires like love, financial gain, or validation. This goal-directed attention makes them consciously filter out red flags, ignoring warnings from friends and family.

    • Bottom-Up (Automatic): Scam victims can be drawn to emotionally charged or urgent messages. For example, scammers might use sudden requests for help or fabricated crises that automatically capture the victim’s attention, overriding any logical reasoning they may have.

In this phase, scammers exploit both conscious goals and automatic reactions, leading victims to focus intensely on the scam and miss critical signs of deceit.

After the Scam

    • Top-Down: In the aftermath, many victims struggle to reorient their attention due to the trauma and cognitive dissonance caused by the scam. The brain’s top-down control may continue to focus on self-blame, shame, and regret. They might consciously avoid confronting their emotional pain or the reality of their victimization, which can delay recovery.

    • Bottom-Up: Victims may become hypersensitive to stimuli related to the scam, such as receiving emails or financial requests. The trauma can trigger automatic emotional responses (e.g., anxiety, fear) in response to seemingly unrelated events, leading to hypervigilance. Their brain may automatically react to any stimuli resembling scam-related triggers, even if they are no longer under direct threat.

How These Processes Interact with Selective Attention and Perception Filtering in Scam Victims

    1. Selective Attention During the Scam: Victims deliberately focus on the positive aspects of the scam (e.g., promises of romance, financial gain) through top-down control. However, when the scammer uses urgency or emotional appeals, bottom-up processes override rational thinking, causing victims to prioritize these immediate stimuli.

    2. Perception Filtering Post-Scam: Victims may unconsciously filter out support from loved ones or professional advice that could aid recovery. Their top-down mechanisms keep them focused on feelings of guilt or shame, while bottom-up emotional triggers may prevent them from engaging in conversations about moving forward or healing.

    3. Attentional Selection and Recovery: To break free from the trauma, victims need to regain control over attentional selection, using top-down strategies to focus on recovery, self-compassion, and support. However, the lingering effects of trauma can keep bottom-up responses active, making it difficult to shift focus from the past to the future.

Scammers manipulate both top-down and bottom-up processes to control their victims’ attention, leaving them focused on the scam and blind to the deception. Even after the scam, the trauma reinforces harmful attention patterns, trapping victims in cycles of shame, guilt, and emotional reactivity. Understanding these mechanisms is key to helping victims break free and regain control over their attention and perception, allowing them to recover and rebuild their lives.

Balancing Attention to Heal and Recover

The profound trauma of being victimized by a scam can significantly affect how selective attention and perceptual filtering operate in a victim’s mind. While these mechanisms are designed to protect and manage overwhelming emotional input, they can also hinder healing by preventing victims from seeing the full reality of their situation. By understanding how these processes work, victims, loved ones, and mental health professionals can better navigate the emotional aftermath of scams, helping victims recognize and address the mental filters that keep them trapped in cycles of denial, anger, and self-blame. Overcoming these cognitive barriers is key to recovering from the trauma of being scammed and rebuilding emotional resilience.

Please Leave Us Your Comment
Also, tell us of any topics we might have missed.

Leave a Reply

Your comments help the SCARS Institute better understand all scam victim/survivor experiences and improve our services and processes. Thank you

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Thank you for your comment. You may receive an email to follow up. We never share your data with marketers.

Recent Reader Comments

Important Information for New Scam Victims

Please visit www.ScamVictimsSupport.org – a SCARS Website for New Scam Victims Enroll in SCARS Scam Survivor’s School for FREE – visit www.SCARSeducation.org to register – FREE for scam victims/survivors If you are looking for local trauma counselors please visit counseling.AgainstScams.org or join SCARS for our counseling/therapy benefit: membership.AgainstScams.org If you need to speak with someone now, you can dial 988 in the U.S. or Canada, or find phone numbers for crisis hotlines all around the world here: www.opencounseling.com/suicide-hotlines

A Question of Trust

At the SCARS Institute, we invite you to do your own research on the topics we speak about and publish, Our team investigates the subject being discussed, especially when it comes to understanding the scam victims-survivors experience. You can do Google searches but in many cases, you will have to wade through scientific papers and studies. However, remember that biases and perspectives matter and influence the outcome. Regardless, we encourage you to explore these topics as thoroughly as you can for your own awareness.

SCARS Resources:

 

A Note About Labeling!

We often use the term ‘scam victim’ in our articles, but this is a convenience to help those searching for information in search engines like Google. It is just a convenience and has no deeper meaning. If you have come through such an experience, YOU are a Survivor! It was not your fault. You are not alone! Axios!

Statement About Victim Blaming

Some of our articles discuss various aspects of victims. This is both about better understanding victims (the science of victimology) and their behaviors and psychology. This helps us to educate victims/survivors about why these crimes happened and to not blame themselves, better develop recovery programs, and to help victims avoid scams in the future. At times this may sound like blaming the victim, but it does not blame scam victims, we are simply explaining the hows and whys of the experience victims have.

These articles, about the Psychology of Scams or Victim Psychology – meaning that all humans have psychological or cognitive characteristics in common that can either be exploited or work against us – help us all to understand the unique challenges victims face before, during, and after scams, fraud, or cybercrimes. These sometimes talk about some of the vulnerabilities the scammers exploit. Victims rarely have control of them or are even aware of them, until something like a scam happens and then they can learn how their mind works and how to overcome these mechanisms.

Articles like these help victims and others understand these processes and how to help prevent them from being exploited again or to help them recover more easily by understanding their post-scam behaviors. Learn more about the Psychology of Scams at www.ScamPsychology.org

Psychology Disclaimer:

All articles about psychology, neurology, and the human brain on this website are for information & education only

The information provided in these articles is intended for educational and self-help purposes only and should not be construed as a substitute for professional therapy or counseling.

While any self-help techniques outlined herein may be beneficial for scam victims seeking to recover from their experience and move towards recovery, it is important to consult with a qualified mental health professional before initiating any course of action. Each individual’s experience and needs are unique, and what works for one person may not be suitable for another.

Additionally, any approach may not be appropriate for individuals with certain pre-existing mental health conditions or trauma histories. It is advisable to seek guidance from a licensed therapist or counselor who can provide personalized support, guidance, and treatment tailored to your specific needs.

If you are experiencing significant distress or emotional difficulties related to a scam or other traumatic event, please consult your doctor or mental health provider for appropriate care and support.

Also, please read our SCARS Institute Statement About Professional Care for Scam Victims – here

If you are in crisis, feeling desperate, or in despair please call 988 or your local crisis hotline.

-/ 30 /-

What do you think about this?

Please share your thoughts in a comment below!

Opinions

The opinions of the author are not necessarily those of the Society of Citizens Against Rleationship Scams Inc. The author is solely responsible for the content of their work. SCARS is protected under the Communications Decency Act (CDA) section 230 from liability.

Disclaimer:

SCARS IS A DIGITAL PUBLISHER AND DOES NOT OFFER HEALTH OR MEDICAL ADVICE, LEGAL ADVICE, FINANCIAL ADVICE, OR SERVICES THAT SCARS IS NOT LICENSED OR REGISTERED TO PERFORM.

IF YOU’RE FACING A MEDICAL EMERGENCY, CALL YOUR LOCAL EMERGENCY SERVICES IMMEDIATELY, OR VISIT THE NEAREST EMERGENCY ROOM OR URGENT CARE CENTER. YOU SHOULD CONSULT YOUR HEALTHCARE PROVIDER BEFORE FOLLOWING ANY MEDICALLY RELATED INFORMATION PRESENTED ON OUR PAGES.

ALWAYS CONSULT A LICENSED ATTORNEY FOR ANY ADVICE REGARDING LEGAL MATTERS.

A LICENSED FINANCIAL OR TAX PROFESSIONAL SHOULD BE CONSULTED BEFORE ACTING ON ANY INFORMATION RELATING TO YOUR PERSONAL FINANCES OR TAX RELATED ISSUES AND INFORMATION.

SCARS IS NOT A PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR – WE DO NOT PROVIDE INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES FOR INDIVIDUALS OR BUSINESSES. ANY INVESTIGATIONS THAT SCARS MAY PERFORM IS NOT A SERVICE PROVIDED TO THIRD-PARTIES. INFORMATION REPORTED TO SCARS MAY BE FORWARDED TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AS SCARS SEE FIT AND APPROPRIATE.

This content and other material contained on the website, apps, newsletter, and products (“Content”), is general in nature and for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical, legal, or financial advice; the Content is not intended to be a substitute for licensed or regulated professional advice. Always consult your doctor or other qualified healthcare provider, lawyer, financial, or tax professional with any questions you may have regarding the educational information contained herein. SCARS makes no guarantees about the efficacy of information described on or in SCARS’ Content. The information contained is subject to change and is not intended to cover all possible situations or effects. SCARS does not recommend or endorse any specific professional or care provider, product, service, or other information that may be mentioned in SCARS’ websites, apps, and Content unless explicitly identified as such.

The disclaimers herein are provided on this page for ease of reference. These disclaimers supplement and are a part of SCARS’ website’s Terms of Use

Legal Notices: 

All original content is Copyright © 1991 – 2024 Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc. (Registered D.B.A SCARS) All Rights Reserved Worldwide & Webwide. Third-party copyrights acknowledged.

U.S. State of Florida Registration Nonprofit (Not for Profit) #N20000011978 [SCARS DBA Registered #G20000137918] – Learn more at www.AgainstScams.org

SCARS, SCARS|INTERNATIONAL, SCARS, SCARS|SUPPORT, SCARS, RSN, Romance Scams Now, SCARS|INTERNATION, SCARS|WORLDWIDE, SCARS|GLOBAL, SCARS, Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams, Society of Citizens Against Romance Scams, SCARS|ANYSCAM, Project Anyscam, Anyscam, SCARS|GOFCH, GOFCH, SCARS|CHINA, SCARS|CDN, SCARS|UK, SCARS|LATINOAMERICA, SCARS|MEMBER, SCARS|VOLUNTEER, SCARS Cybercriminal Data Network, Cobalt Alert, Scam Victims Support Group, SCARS ANGELS, SCARS RANGERS, SCARS MARSHALLS, SCARS PARTNERS, are all trademarks of Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc., All Rights Reserved Worldwide

Contact the legal department for the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Incorporated by email at legal@AgainstScams.org