Cognitive Bias: Just-World Bias

Principal Category: Cognitive Biases

Authors:
•  Tim McGuinness, Ph.D. – Anthropologist, Scientist, Director of the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc.

The Just-World Bias convinces individuals that the world operates fairly, attributing consequences to deserving actions.

In the context of crime victims, this bias leads to self-blame and guilt, as they may believe they somehow deserved the crime or could have prevented it. Rooted in the belief that actions result in morally fitting outcomes, this bias often rationalizes suffering as deserved punishment.

Widely studied by social psychologists, it appears in common sayings like “everything happens for a reason,” perpetuating the notion of cosmic justice. Understanding this bias is crucial in addressing victim self-blame and promoting empathy in support systems. Explore more biases in the SCARS MANUAL OF COGNITIVE BIASES.

SCARS Journal of Scam Psychology - Manual of Cognitive Biases - on SCARS ScamPsychology.org

The Just-World Bias

This Cognitive Bias: The Just-World Bias refers to the belief that the world is just and that people get what they deserve.

This cognitive bias can affect crime victims by leading them to blame themselves for the crime that was committed against them. They may feel that they did something to deserve it or that they could have prevented it, even if there is no logical reason to believe that this is true. This can lead to feelings of guilt and self-blame, which can further exacerbate the trauma of the crime.

“Everything happens for a reason” 

The just-world hypothesis or just-world fallacy is the cognitive bias that assumes that “people get what they deserve” – that actions will have morally fair and fitting consequences for the actor. For example, the assumptions that noble actions will eventually be rewarded and evil actions will eventually be punished fall under this hypothesis. In other words, the just-world hypothesis is the tendency to attribute consequences to, or expect consequences as the result of, either a universal force that restores moral balance or a universal connection between the nature of actions and their results. This belief generally implies the existence of cosmic justice, destiny, divine providence, desert, stability, and/or order. It is often associated with a variety of fundamental fallacies, especially in regard to rationalizing suffering on the grounds that the sufferers “deserve” it.

The hypothesis popularly appears in the English language in various figures of speech that imply guaranteed punishment for wrongdoing, such as: “you got what was coming to you”, “what goes around comes around”, “chickens come home to roost”, “everything happens for a reason”, and “you reap what you sow”. This hypothesis has been widely studied by social psychologists since Melvin J. Lerner conducted seminal work on the belief in a just world in the early 1960s.

This is also part of the thinking behind “Kharma.”

More Cognitive Biases: SCARS MANUAL OF COGNITIVE BIASES (scampsychology.org)

Important Information for New Scam Victims

-/ 30 /-

What do you think about this?

Please share your thoughts in a comment below!

  • SCARS Journal of Scam Psychology - Manual of Cognitive Biases - on SCARS ScamPsychology.org
SCARS Institute 12 Years service scam victims

Welcome to the SCARS INSTITUTE Journal of Scam Psychology

A Journal of Applied Scam, Fraud, and Cybercrime Psychology – and Allied Sciences

A dedicated site for psychology, victimology, criminology, applied sociology and anthropology, and allied sciences, published by the SCARS INSTITUTE™ – Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc.

Published On: April 20th, 2024Last Updated: April 20th, 2024Categories: • ARTICLE, • COGNITIVE BIASES, ♦ COGNITIVE BIAS, 20240 CommentsTags: 460 words2.4 min readTotal Views: 897Daily Views: 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PUBLICATION CATEGORIES

A Question of Trust

At the SCARS Institute, we invite you to do your own research on the topics we speak about and publish, Our team investigates the subject being discussed, especially when it comes to understanding the scam victims-survivors experience. You can do Google searches but in many cases, you will have to wade through scientific papers and studies. However, remember that biases and perspectives matter and influence the outcome. Regardless, we encourage you to explore these topics as thoroughly as you can for your own awareness.

Please Leave A Comment

Your comments help the SCARS Institute better understand all scam victim/survivor experiences and improve our services and processes. Thank you

Thank you for your comment. You may receive an email to follow up. We never share your data with marketers.

Recent Comments
On Other Articles

A Note About Labeling!

We often use the term ‘scam victim’ in our articles, but this is a convenience to help those searching for information in search engines like Google. It is just a convenience and has no deeper meaning. If you have come through such an experience, YOU are a Survivor! It was not your fault. You are not alone! Axios!

Statement About Victim Blaming

Some of our articles discuss various aspects of victims. This is both about better understanding victims (the science of victimology) and their behaviors and psychology. This helps us to educate victims/survivors about why these crimes happened and to not blame themselves, better develop recovery programs, and to help victims avoid scams in the future. At times this may sound like blaming the victim, but it does not blame scam victims, we are simply explaining the hows and whys of the experience victims have.

These articles, about the Psychology of Scams or Victim Psychology – meaning that all humans have psychological or cognitive characteristics in common that can either be exploited or work against us – help us all to understand the unique challenges victims face before, during, and after scams, fraud, or cybercrimes. These sometimes talk about some of the vulnerabilities the scammers exploit. Victims rarely have control of them or are even aware of them, until something like a scam happens and then they can learn how their mind works and how to overcome these mechanisms.

Articles like these help victims and others understand these processes and how to help prevent them from being exploited again or to help them recover more easily by understanding their post-scam behaviors. Learn more about the Psychology of Scams at www.ScamPsychology.org

Psychology Disclaimer:

All articles about psychology, neurology, and the human brain on this website are for information & education only

The information provided in these articles is intended for educational and self-help purposes only and should not be construed as a substitute for professional therapy or counseling.

While any self-help techniques outlined herein may be beneficial for scam victims seeking to recover from their experience and move towards recovery, it is important to consult with a qualified mental health professional before initiating any course of action. Each individual’s experience and needs are unique, and what works for one person may not be suitable for another.

Additionally, any approach may not be appropriate for individuals with certain pre-existing mental health conditions or trauma histories. It is advisable to seek guidance from a licensed therapist or counselor who can provide personalized support, guidance, and treatment tailored to your specific needs.

If you are experiencing significant distress or emotional difficulties related to a scam or other traumatic event, please consult your doctor or mental health provider for appropriate care and support.

Also, please read our SCARS Institute Statement About Professional Care for Scam Victims – here

If you are in crisis, feeling desperate, or in despair please call 988 or your local crisis hotline.

SCARS Institute Resources: