Pre-existing Mental Health Factors and Scam Victim Recovery

Principal Category: Recovery Psychology

Authors:
•  Vianey Gonzalez B.Sc(Psych) – Licensed Psychologist, Specialty in Crime Victim Trauma Therapy, Neuropsychologist, Certified Deception Professional, Psychology Advisory Panel & Director of the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc.
•  Tim McGuinness, Ph.D. – Anthropologist, Scientist, Polymath, Director of the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc.

 

 

Abstract

Pre-existing mental health factors can influence how scam victims recover after grooming, manipulation, and betrayal trauma. Two victims with similar losses may show different levels of hypervigilance, depression, shame, dissociation, rumination, or compulsive checking based on earlier anxiety, prior trauma, attachment insecurity, neurodiversity, substance vulnerability, and long-standing coping styles. These factors can amplify reward, attachment, and threat systems, making triggers feel stronger and decision-making less reliable. The approach emphasizes risk patterns rather than labels and rejects victim blaming. It recommends pacing, predictable routines, containment strategies for rumination, and layered support that includes trauma-informed clinical care when symptoms become persistent, impairing, or risky.

Pre-existing Mental Health Factors and Scam Victim Recovery

Why Recovery Can Look Different From Person to Person

Mental Health Factors and Scam Victim Recovery can vary significantly from person to person.

Two scam victims can experience the same grooming pattern, lose similar amounts of money, and still recover at very different speeds and in very different ways. That difference often has less to do with intelligence and more to do with what the nervous system was carrying before the scam happened.

Research across trauma psychology shows that pre-trauma mental health conditions and prior adversity can increase the risk of more persistent post-traumatic symptoms after a traumatic event. Psychiatric history and prior distress are among the factors most consistently associated with stronger post-traumatic stress responses, even when the trauma exposure is similar.

For scam victims, this matters because relationship scams are not just financial crimes. They are a unique combination of attachment and betrayal injuries. They combine coercion, constant manipulation and control, indoctrination, intermittent belief reinforcement, identity disruption, and betrayal. When that type of trauma lands on top of pre-existing vulnerabilities, recovery can become more complex and less predictable. Studies of romance scam victims describe substantial psychological and emotional impacts, including shame, distress, and lasting disruption to trust, which can interact with existing vulnerabilities.

What This Topic Is and What It Is Not

This topic is about risk factors and patterns, not labels.

A pre-existing psychological condition does not mean a person will recover poorly. It means the person may need more structure, more time, and more targeted supports, especially with a combination of professionally managed support and professional therapy. It also means the nervous system may default to familiar coping strategies under stress, even when those strategies create long-term costs.

This topic also does not mean that the scam was caused by a person’s mental health history. Scammers target human needs, especially connection, hope, and belonging. Victimization is a crime committed by offenders. It is not the victim’s fault.

What It Is

A practical definition of “pre-existing psychological factors” is any ongoing mental health pattern that was present before the scam and that can shape how threat, attachment loss, shame, and uncertainty are processed afterward.

These factors can include diagnosed conditions, subclinical symptoms, trauma histories, attachment patterns, neurodevelopmental traits, substance use vulnerability, and chronic stress states. They may also include unresolved grief, recent life transitions, or long-standing loneliness.

How It Works

The scam trains the brain in three systems at the same time.

Reward and reinforcement learning. Intermittent rewards strengthen craving and persistence. This is the same learning principle used in gambling reinforcement. For many victims, the brain learns that intense longing and occasional reassurance belong together, which increases compulsive checking and re-engagement urges.

Attachment circuitry. Bonding can form even when the relationship is fabricated, because the bonding response is driven by perceived intimacy, consistency, and emotional investment.

Threat and survival activation. When the scam collapses, the brain shifts into threat processing, rumination, hypervigilance, and avoidance. If a person already had an anxious threat system or prior trauma, the threat response can become louder and harder to turn off.

Pre-existing conditions can amplify one or more of these systems. That is why recovery can look different even among victims who share the same scam type.

Why It Affects Scam Victims

Trauma from a relationship scam is primarily a betrayal-based trauma, though attachment-based trauma can also be present. Betrayal trauma tends to create high shame, high self-doubt, and a strong drive to restore meaning quickly. Those forces can collide with pre-existing symptoms in predictable ways.

When a person already struggles with anxiety, uncertainty becomes harder to tolerate. When a person already struggles with depression, loss, and hopelessness these can deepen and make them more persistent. When a person already has attachment insecurity, separation and abandonment cues can become overwhelming. When a person already has obsessive rumination tendencies, the mind can lock onto the “how could this happen” loop for longer.

What to Watch For

These are common patterns that suggest pre-existing factors may be shaping recovery. They are not diagnostic markers.

• Persistent, global shame and self-condemnation that does not soften with education and support.
• Severe avoidance of all social contact, not just risky contact.
• Compulsive checking, reassurance seeking, or “investigation loops” that consume daily functioning.
• Rapid cycling between intense longing for the scammer and intense hatred or disgust.
• Chronic dissociation, emotional numbing, or memory fragmentation, especially when triggers are minor.
• Escalating substance use, gambling, or other numbing behaviors after the scam ends.
• A pattern of repeated victimization that continues despite insight and intention.
• How Common Pre-existing Patterns Can Shape Recovery
• Anxiety Disorders and Chronic Hypervigilance

A person with pre-existing anxiety can recover with complete success, but the pathway often requires explicit nervous system regulation skills. Anxiety primes the brain to overestimate threat and underestimate coping capacity. After a scam, that can look like constant scanning for fraud, trouble sleeping, panic spikes, and difficulty making ordinary decisions.

In trauma research, higher pre-trauma distress is associated with higher post-trauma symptoms. That does not mean anxiety causes the trauma response. It means the baseline threat system is already tuned toward alarm.

What helps most is predictable routines, limited exposure to triggering platforms, and stepwise rebuilding of confidence through small, repeatable safety behaviors.

Depressive Disorders and the Collapse of Meaning

Depression can make scam recovery feel like walking through wet concrete. Motivation drops. Hope feels unsafe. Self-worth collapses more quickly. Depression also increases cognitive bias toward negative interpretations, which can intensify self-blame.

Depression can also interact with financial loss in a practical way. When energy is low, victims may delay paperwork, reporting, and boundary-setting. Then consequences accumulate, and shame intensifies.

The core support here is not inspirational messaging. It is structure, behavioral activation, and social scaffolding that reduce isolation and restore a sense of agency.

Prior Trauma and Sensitization

Prior trauma can sensitize the stress response. The new betrayal can reactivate older themes such as abandonment, humiliation, powerlessness, or coercion. Even when the prior trauma was unrelated, the nervous system can treat the scam collapse as “the same danger” and respond with intensified shutdown, fight responses, or panic.

Meta-analytic and systematic review work on PTSD risk indicates that pre-trauma factors, including prior psychological difficulties and adversity, can contribute to a higher risk for persistent post-traumatic symptoms.

For scam victims, this often shows up as outsized reactions to reminders, not because the person is weak, but because the nervous system has learned that closeness can equal danger.

Attachment Insecurity and Trauma Bond Persistence

Attachment insecurity can make separation feel like annihilation. That can drive repeated attempts to contact the scammer, or it can drive immediate replacement seeking. It can also create a heightened sensitivity to perceived rejection from friends and family who do not understand the scam.

Research on romance scam impacts highlights how deeply the victim’s experience can disrupt trust, belonging, and self-perception. When attachment insecurity already existed, the injury can cut deeper and last longer.

The recovery target is not “never trust again.” The target is learning safer attachment: boundaries, pacing, verification habits, and tolerating loneliness without panic.

Obsessive-Compulsive Traits and Rumination Traps

Some victims have long-standing tendencies toward perfectionism, checking, or intrusive doubt. After a scam, it can become an endless attempt to solve an unsolvable puzzle. The victim replays messages, hunts for the “one clue,” and tries to restore certainty by analysis.

This pattern can look productive, but it often functions as an avoidance of grief and shame. It can also keep the nervous system activated.

These victims often benefit from containment plans: set times for documentation, set times for support, and strict limits on re-reading scam communications.

Substance Use Vulnerability and Emotional Anesthesia

A person with a history of substance misuse, or even a mild reliance on alcohol for sleep, is at higher risk of escalating use after the trauma of a scam. The scam creates a withdrawal-like state for many victims, including craving, agitation, and numbness. Some will reach for substances to quiet the system.

This does not mean abstinence is easy. It means the person may need a dual-focus plan: scam recovery plus relapse prevention supports, ideally with professionals who understand trauma.

Personality Patterns and Coping Styles

Some people have long-standing coping styles that become more rigid under threat. For example, a person with high people-pleasing traits may struggle to set boundaries, even after learning the facts. A person with chronic distrust may become fully socially withdrawn, which blocks recovery supports. A person with high impulsivity may “replace pain” with fast new relationships, high-risk investments, or online engagement that resembles the original grooming environment.

This is not about blame. It is about predictability. Under stress, the brain defaults to the known.

Neurodiversity, Social Cognition, and Exploitation Risk

Some victims have autism spectrum traits, ADHD, or other neurodevelopmental differences that shape social interpretation, impulsivity, novelty-seeking, and reward sensitivity. These traits can increase vulnerability to certain manipulation tactics and can complicate recovery when executive functioning is taxed.

The solution is not shame. The solution is practical safeguards: verification routines, trusted third-party reviews before major decisions, reduced exposure to high-pressure environments, and explicit education about manipulation patterns.

How to Talk About This Without Stigmatizing Victims

This topic can easily slip into victim-blaming language. A safer framing is “pre-existing load.”

The nervous system had a load before the scam. The scam adds a heavy load on top of it. Recovery depends on how quickly the system can reduce that load, restore safety, and rebuild meaning.

That framing keeps the focus where it belongs: on support, protection, and realistic recovery planning.

What to Do Next

Build a Recovery Plan That Matches the Person, Not the Ideal

If a victim has pre-existing anxiety, the plan should lead with regulation skills and predictable routines. If the victim has depression, the plan should lead with structure, social contact, and small wins. If the victim has prior trauma, the plan should lead with stabilization and trauma-informed care, not forced exposure. If the victim has compulsive rumination, the plan should include containment and limits.

The most important principle is pacing. Faster is not better. Safer is better.

Of course, this is not the work of a support group or community; this is the work of a professional trauma-informed therapist.

Use Layered Support

• Layered support means more than one source of regulation.
• A trauma-informed clinician, when symptoms are persistent or impairing.
• Peer support that reduces isolation and shame.
• Practical support for reporting, finances, and identity recovery, so the victim is not carrying everything alone.
• Family education, so loved ones do not pressure, shame, or misread symptoms.

Know When to Seek Clinical Help

Clinical support becomes especially important when any of these are present.

• Suicidal thoughts or self-harm urges.
• Severe dissociation, memory loss, or “lost time.”
• Escalating substance use.
• Inability to function at work or at home for weeks.
• Panic attacks that are frequent or disabling.
• Repeated re-engagement with scammers despite clear insight.

Recovery Notes

Pre-existing mental health factors do not disqualify a person from full recovery. They usually mean the person needs a plan that is more structured and more compassionate.

A scam not only breaks trust in other people. It often breaks trust in oneself. When someone already struggles with anxiety, depression, trauma history, or compulsive doubt, that self-trust injury can feel larger and harder to repair. That is why education alone is sometimes not enough. Skills, support, and pacing matter.

The goal is not to become invulnerable. The goal is to become anchored: grounded enough to tolerate feeling, clear enough to evaluate risk, and supported enough to rebuild life without rushing into new harm.

Key Takeaways

• Pre-existing mental health symptoms can shape how intensely a scam victim experiences shame, threat, and attachment loss.
• Trauma research supports that pre-trauma distress and psychiatric history are associated with higher risk for persistent post-traumatic symptoms.
• Romance scam impacts often include deep disruptions to trust and identity, which can interact with attachment insecurity and prior trauma.
• Recovery plans work best when they match the person’s baseline vulnerabilities, not an ideal timeline.
• Support should be layered and paced, with clinical care when symptoms become persistent, impairing, or risky.

Conclusion

Pre-existing mental health factors can shape scam victim recovery in ways that are easy to miss if someone expects a single, standard timeline. After a relationship scam, the nervous system may already be carrying anxiety, depression, prior trauma, attachment insecurity, rumination patterns, neurodevelopmental traits, or substance vulnerability. When betrayal trauma lands on top of that load, the brain may respond with stronger threat activation, deeper shame, more persistent cravings for reassurance, and more rigid coping habits. None of this makes victimization a victim’s fault, and none of it makes recovery impossible.

You can treat this reality as a planning tool. When you match recovery steps to the person instead of an ideal schedule, you reduce self-blame and increase safety. You also lower the risk of repeat victimization by adding structure, pacing, and external supports where the nervous system is most likely to struggle. Education matters, but it works best when it is paired with regulation skills, stable routines, and trauma-informed professional care when symptoms are persistent or impairing. Recovery is not a race. Recovery is a process of rebuilding capacity, restoring self-trust, and returning to connection without rushing into new harm.

Glossary

• Accommodation — Accommodation is the process of updating mental schemas when new information does not fit existing beliefs. In scam recovery, it can describe how the mind slowly accepts betrayal without collapsing into shame.
• ADHD — ADHD can shape attention, impulsivity, and reward seeking, which scammers often exploit through urgency and novelty. In recovery, structure and external reminders can reduce overwhelm and improve follow-through.
• Agency — Agency is the capacity to make choices that align with safety, values, and long-term goals. Scam trauma can weaken agency through fear, shame, and confusion, so recovery often rebuilds it step by step.
• Anxiety Disorders — Anxiety disorders involve persistent threat sensitivity that can intensify hypervigilance after a scam. Recovery often improves when the person practices nervous system regulation and limits triggering exposures.
• Attachment Circuitry — Attachment circuitry refers to brain and body systems that support bonding, closeness, and separation distress. Scammers hijack this system, and recovery often requires a safe connection and paced re-engagement.
• Attachment Insecurity — Attachment insecurity describes patterns of fearing abandonment or mistrusting closeness based on earlier experiences. After a scam, it can intensify longing, replacement seeking, or withdrawal, and it often improves with boundaries and stable support.
• Attachment Injury — Attachment injury is the emotional harm that occurs when trust and connection are violated in a close relationship. In scams, it can create persistent doubt, grief, and difficulty trusting future partners.
• Autism Spectrum Traits — Autism spectrum traits can affect social interpretation, literal thinking, and trust calibration, which scammers may exploit through scripted intimacy. Recovery can benefit from explicit education, verification routines, and trusted third-party checks.
• Avoidance — Avoidance is a coping strategy that reduces distress by escaping reminders, decisions, or emotions. In scam recovery, avoidance can protect early stabilization but can also prolong healing when it blocks grief and practical tasks.
• Behavioral Activation — Behavioral activation is a depression focused approach that rebuilds motivation through small, scheduled actions. It can help scam victims regain agency when grief and fatigue make basic tasks feel impossible.
• Betrayal Trauma — Betrayal trauma is trauma caused by harm from a trusted or depended upon figure, which disrupts safety and meaning. In relationship scams, it commonly fuels shame, self-doubt, and intense rumination.
• Boundary Enforcement — Boundary enforcement is the practice of setting limits and following through when limits are tested. It helps scam victims reduce re-engagement risk and rebuild self-trust through consistent, protective actions.
• Cognitive Bias — Cognitive bias is a predictable thinking shortcut that can distort judgment under stress. After a scam, negative bias can amplify self-blame, while optimism bias can increase vulnerability to repeat contact.
• Cognitive Fog — Cognitive fog is slowed thinking, poor concentration, and reduced working memory, often seen after chronic stress or trauma. It can complicate reporting and decision-making, so recovery often uses checklists and simplified steps.
• Cognitive Reappraisal — Cognitive reappraisal is reframing an event to reduce emotional intensity without denying facts. For scam victims, it can shift meaning from self-blame toward recognizing coercion and manipulation.
• Coercion — Coercion is control through pressure, fear, urgency, or consequences that reduce free choice. In scams, coercion can train compliance, and recovery often restores choice through pacing and external supports.
• Compulsive Checking — Compulsive checking is repeated monitoring of messages, accounts, or information to reduce uncertainty. It can briefly soothe anxiety, but often reinforces threat loops, so containment plans can help.
• Compulsive Rumination — Compulsive rumination is repetitive mental replay focused on finding certainty or preventing future harm. In scam recovery, it can function as grief avoidance, and timed limits can reduce its hold.
• Containment Plan — A containment plan is a structured limit on distressing activities such as rereading messages or researching the scam. It protects attention and sleep, and it supports healing by preventing endless investigation loops.
• Craving — Craving is a strong urge for contact, reassurance, or emotional relief that can feel physical and urgent. Scam-related craving can mimic withdrawal, so survivors often need regulation skills and accountability.
• Depressive Disorders — Depressive disorders involve low mood, reduced energy, and negative interpretations that can deepen after a scam. Recovery often improves with structure, social scaffolding, and professional care when symptoms persist.
• Derealization — Derealization is a sense that the world feels unreal, distant, or dreamlike while reality testing remains intact. It can increase after betrayal trauma, and grounding skills can reduce intensity.
• Dissociation — Dissociation is a disruption in attention, awareness, memory, or sense of self that often appears under overwhelming stress. Scam victims may experience numbing or detachment, which can lessen as safety and regulation return.
• Dopamine Pathways — Dopamine pathways support motivation, learning, and reward prediction. Scam grooming can condition these circuits through intermittent reinforcement, and recovery often requires reducing triggers and restoring baseline routines.
• Emotional Numbing — Emotional numbing is reduced access to feelings as a protective response to overwhelm. In scam recovery, it can look like being calm or detached while internally distressed, and it often resolves with safety and pacing.
• Executive Functioning — Executive functioning includes planning, impulse control, and task initiation, which can be impaired by trauma and stress. Scam victims often benefit from external supports like lists, reminders, and simplified decisions.
• External Regulation — External regulation is calming support provided by safe people or structured environments when self-regulation is limited. It can include supportive conversations, coaching, and predictable routines that reduce nervous system load.
• Family Education — Family education helps loved ones understand trauma responses so they do not shame or pressure the survivor. It supports recovery by improving communication and reducing misinterpretations of symptoms.
• Gambling Reinforcement — Gambling reinforcement is a learning pattern where unpredictable rewards strengthen persistence and obsession. Scammers often use this through intermittent contact, which can condition craving and compulsive checking.
• Grief Processing — Grief processing is the gradual ability to feel loss and integrate meaning without being overwhelmed. Scam victims often grieve both the imagined relationship and the real losses, and pacing prevents flooding.
• Hypervigilance — Hypervigilance is persistent scanning for danger that keeps the body in a threat state. After a scam, it can show up as constant fraud checking, and regulation skills can help the system stand down.
• Identity Disruption — Identity disruption is a destabilization of self-concept, confidence, and role continuity after betrayal and coercion. Recovery often rebuilds identity through stable routines, values work, and safe relationships.
• Impulsivity — Impulsivity is acting quickly for relief or reward without full risk evaluation, often worsened by stress and craving. Scam recovery may reduce impulsivity through sleep repair, structure, and delayed decision rules.
• Intermittent Reinforcement — Intermittent reinforcement is a reward delivered unpredictably, which strengthens attachment and persistence. Scammers use it through inconsistent affection, and recovery improves when contact and triggering cues are removed.
• Layered Support — Layered support means using multiple stabilizing resources, such as therapy, peer support, and practical help. It reduces overload by sharing the weight across systems instead of relying on willpower alone.
• Loneliness — Loneliness is a painful perceived disconnection that can increase vulnerability to grooming and re-engagement. In recovery, safe community contact can reduce loneliness without exposing survivors to high-risk intimacy.
• Magical Thinking — Magical thinking is believing hope or desire can override evidence and risk. After trauma, it can reappear as a coping attempt, so education and verification habits can protect against repeat victimization.
• Meaning Making — Meaning making is creating an accurate, compassionate understanding of what happened and what it means for the future. It supports recovery by reducing chaos and anchoring action in facts rather than shame.
• Neurodevelopmental Differences — Neurodevelopmental differences include patterns such as ADHD and autism traits that shape attention, social cognition, and reward sensitivity. Recovery plans often work best when they include explicit safeguards and reduced complexity.
• Neurodiversity — Neurodiversity recognizes natural variation in brain functioning without defining difference as a defect. In scam recovery, it supports practical planning that fits the person’s real strengths and limits.
• Nervous System Load — Nervous system load is the total stress burden the body is carrying from prior factors, plus the scam injury. Higher load can slow recovery, so stabilization and reduced exposure become priority steps.
• Nervous System Regulation — Nervous system regulation is the ability to shift from threat activation into calmer states that support thinking and connection. Scam victims often build it through breathing, grounding, movement, and predictable routines.
• Pacing — Pacing is choosing a recovery speed that prevents flooding and supports integration. It often helps victims avoid setbacks by matching exposure to their capacity rather than forcing rapid insight.
• Peer Support — Peer support is a connection with others who understand the experience and reduce isolation and shame. It can provide validation and accountability, while professional therapy addresses complex symptoms.
• People Pleasing — People pleasing is prioritizing others’ approval to reduce conflict or rejection, often intensified under stress. It can weaken boundaries after a scam, so recovery focuses on consent, limits, and self-protection.
• Personality Patterns — Personality patterns are long-standing ways of coping, relating, and interpreting events that can become rigid under threat. In scam recovery, they can shape avoidance, impulsivity, or distrust, and awareness helps with planning.
• Post-Trauma Symptoms — Post-trauma symptoms include hypervigilance, intrusive memories, avoidance, sleep disruption, and emotional numbing after a threatening event. Scam victims may experience these even without a formal diagnosis, and support can reduce them.
• Pre-existing Load — Pre-existing load is the combination of mental health patterns and stress present before the scam. It helps explain why recovery differs without blaming the victim or implying the scam was self-caused.
• Pre-trauma Distress — Pre-trauma distress is elevated anxiety, depression, or stress before a traumatic event. It can predict stronger post-trauma symptoms because the baseline threat system may already be activated.
• Psychiatric History — Psychiatric history refers to prior diagnoses, treatment, or persistent symptoms that may shape stress response. In scam recovery, it can guide the need for more structure, monitoring, and clinical support.
• Recovery Plan — A recovery plan is a structured set of steps that match the person’s risks, capacity, and resources. It often includes safety rules, support layers, routines, and targeted therapy goals.
• Re-engagement Urges — Re-engagement urges are impulses to contact the scammer or seek similar intensity elsewhere to reduce pain. They often reflect conditioned attachment and reward learning, and they decrease with boundaries and time.
• Reinforcement Learning — Reinforcement learning is how the brain strengthens behaviors that sometimes produce reward. In scams, it can train persistence, and recovery reduces it by removing cues and building alternative rewards.
• Repeated Victimization — Repeated victimization is becoming targeted and harmed multiple times, often when shame and dysregulation remain high. Prevention improves with abstinence from risky platforms, verification routines, and stable support.
• Risk Evaluation — Risk evaluation is the ability to assess danger, probability, and consequences before acting. Trauma can impair it, so survivors often benefit from delay rules and trusted third-party reviews.
• Rumination Trap — A rumination trap is getting stuck in repetitive thinking that feels necessary but rarely produces resolution. In scam recovery, it can keep the nervous system activated, so time limits and redirection help.
• Safety Behaviors — Safety behaviors are actions that increase protection and reduce exposure, such as blocking scammers and limiting platforms. They work best when they are consistent and paired with skills that reduce anxiety.
• Self-Blame — Self-blame is assigning responsibility for a crime to the victim rather than the offender, often fueled by shame. It can slow recovery by increasing isolation, and it often improves through education about coercion.
• Self-Trust — Self-trust is confidence in one’s judgment, boundaries, and perceptions. Scams damage it through manipulation, and recovery rebuilds it through small, repeatable choices that create evidence of safety.
• Sensitization — Sensitization is the increased reactivity of the stress system after prior adversity or trauma. In scam recovery, it can explain outsized reactions to reminders, and it often improves with stabilization and therapy.
• Shame — Shame is a global sense of defectiveness that often follows coercive victimization. It can drive secrecy and impulsive coping, so reducing shame is a core protective step for long-term recovery.
• Social Scaffolding — Social scaffolding is structured support that makes recovery tasks easier, such as help with paperwork and regular check-ins. It reduces overload and helps victims function while cognitive fog improves.
• Social Withdrawal — Social withdrawal is pulling away from connection to reduce threat or shame. It can protect in the short term, but often increases depression and vulnerability, so recovery aims for safe, non-romantic support.
• Subclinical Symptoms — Subclinical symptoms are meaningful distress patterns that do not meet full diagnostic criteria. They can still shape scam recovery, especially under stress, and they deserve practical support.
• Substance Use Vulnerability — Substance use vulnerability is an increased risk of using alcohol or drugs to numb distress, especially during withdrawal-like states after a scam. Recovery often needs dual focus support when this risk is present.
• Threat Activation — Threat activation is the nervous system shifting into survival mode with heightened alarm and narrowed thinking. Scams can keep this system engaged long after exposure ends, so regulation skills are essential.
• Trauma-Informed Care — Trauma-informed care is support that assumes behavior may reflect nervous system protection rather than defiance or weakness. It prioritizes safety, choice, collaboration, and pacing to reduce harm.
• Trauma History — Trauma history is prior exposure to overwhelming events that can shape attachment, threat sensitivity, and coping. In scam recovery, it can intensify reactions and increase the need for stabilization first.
• Uncertainty Intolerance — Uncertainty intolerance is the difficulty coping without clear answers, which can intensify checking and reassurance seeking. Scam recovery often improves when survivors practice tolerating ambiguity in small steps.
• Verification Routine — A verification routine is a consistent process for confirming identity, claims, and requests before acting. It protects scam survivors by reducing reliance on emotion-driven judgment during vulnerable periods.

Reference

• Brewin, C. R., Andrews, B., and Valentine, J. D. Risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed adults. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11068961/
• Pretrauma risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review of the literature – Julia A DiGangi, Daisy Gomez, Leslie Mendoza, Leonard A Jason, Christopher B Keys, Karestan C Koenen
  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23792469/
• Ozer, E. J., Best, S. R., Lipsey, T. L., and Weiss, D. S. Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder and symptoms in adults.
  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12555794/
• Whitty, M. T., & Buchanan, T. The online dating romance scam causes and consequences of victimhood.
  https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2013.772180
• Whitty, M. T., & Buchanan, T. The online dating romance scam the psychological impact on victims – both financial and non-financial.
  https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895815603773
• Whitty, M. T. Do You Love Me? Psychological characteristics of romance scam victims. (full text available via PubMed Central)
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5806049/